linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: Fix incorrect interior node logical start values
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:56:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B7AFD0.4040208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B790C0.6080608@redhat.com>

On 11/29/12 10:43 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 11/29/12 10:40 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:22:31AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>
>>> But it's a weird inconsistency isn't it, and fixing it up in fsck should
>>> be the right thing to do anyway?
>>
>> Oh, I agree, but basically, as a result I'm going to put this patch on
>> hold until we do a bit more testing.  I'm just not ready to push this
>> out on the maint branch just yet.....
>>
>> (The general rule is that I want to keep the maint branch in a state
>> where someone who wants to take a snapshot for a production
>> environment should feel generally comfortable to do this --- modulo
>> rollout/integration testing, of course.  I'll keep it on an
>> es/fsck-int-node-fixup branch to make sure we don't lose it, but it's
>> something where I want to add some additional testing before I'm
>> comfortable rolling it out to the maint branch, just to make sure it
>> doesn't trigger any regression.)
> 
> FWIW, I hacked xfstests to always check the scratch device after any
> test uses it, too, and I'm re-running with this change to be sure
> it'll run over every fs modification xfstests makes ...
> 
> I'll send that upstream, too.

FWIW, ./check -g auto w/ fsck of both devices after each test
didn't encounter any fs which triggered this fsck check.

-Eric


      reply	other threads:[~2012-11-29 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15 19:47 [PATCH] e2fsck: Fix incorrect interior node logical start values Eric Sandeen
2012-11-16  2:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-11-16  3:10   ` Eric Sandeen
     [not found] ` <20121129044609.GC8029@thunk.org>
2012-11-29  4:52   ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29  5:49     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-11-29 13:22       ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29 13:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29 15:22   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-11-29 16:40     ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29 16:43       ` Eric Sandeen
2012-11-29 18:56         ` Eric Sandeen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B7AFD0.4040208@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).