From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: ext4 extent status tree LRU locking Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:55:53 -0700 Message-ID: <51BB4B19.6040409@intel.com> References: <51B7B128.60909@intel.com> <20130614140940.GA20401@gmail.com> <51BB3D78.2070907@intel.com> <20130614171116.GB21544@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Theodore Ts'o , Jan kara Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130614171116.GB21544@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On 06/14/2013 10:11 AM, Zheng Liu wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:57:44AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: >> > On 06/14/2013 07:09 AM, Zheng Liu wrote: >>> > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scanned); >>> > > - >>> > > spin_lock(&sbi->s_es_lru_lock); >>> > > + list_sort(NULL, &sbi->s_es_lru, ext4_inode_touch_time_cmp); >>> > > list_for_each_safe(cur, tmp, &sbi->s_es_lru) { >> > >> > How long can this list get? I have the feeling this might get a bit >> > painful, especially on a NUMA machine. > I guess that you worry about the time of sorting a lru list, right? Yeah, just worried about the amount of time it takes to examine (and possibly write to) every item on the list.