linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Hongjiang <zhaohongjiang@huawei.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <hch@lst.de>, <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Subject: Re: xfstests failure generic/239
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:28:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F732FA.9090307@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130608223038.GA19229@thunk.org>

Hi, jack

I test the latest kernel 3.11-rc2 and it seems the problem is fix by the follow patch:
commit id:97a851ed71cd9cc2542955e92a001c6ea3d21d35 (ext4: use io_end for multiple bios).
But it's so difficult to backport to kernel 3.4-stable, any suggestion for this?

Regards,
Zhao


On 2013/6/9 6:30, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 11:13:35AM +0800, Zhao Hongjiang wrote:
>>
>> I run xfstests #239 against mainline 3.10.0-rc3, unfortunately it failure in my QEMU. I run the
>> case a hundred times, it certainly hit the failure several times. The failure msg is as follow:
>>
>> FSTYP         -- ext4
>> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64  3.10.0-rc3-mainline
>>
>> generic/239 1s ... - output mismatch (see /home/zhj/xfstests/results/generic/239.out.bad)
>>     --- tests/generic/239.out   2013-06-07 22:04:09.000000000 -0400
>>     +++ /home/zff/xfstests/results/generic/239.out.bad  2013-06-07 22:04:09.000000000 -0400
>>     @@ -1,2 +1,515 @@
>>      QA output created by 239
>>     +hostname: Host name lookup failure
> 
> OK, so this hostname failure is weird; I'm not sure what's causing
> this, but this I presume unrelated to the failure at hand.
> 
>>      Silence is golden
>>     +0: 0x0
>>     +1: 0x0
>>     +2: 0x0
>>     +3: 0x0
> 
> This indicates a problem.  Test generic/239 is running
> aio-dio-hole-filling-race.c, which submits an asynchronous, direct I/O
> 4k write with a buffer containing non-zero contents to a sparse file,
> and once the I/O has completed, it uses pread to read it back, using
> the same descriptor, so it is doing the read using direct I/O.  It
> then checks to see if the read returns zero or not.  
> 
> The "XX: 0x0" lines indicates that buffer is zero, which implies that
> somehow aio_complete() is getting called before the uninitialized to
> initialized conversion is taking place.  I'm not seeing how this is
> happening, though, so I'm a bit puzzled.  If there are any unwritten
> extents, we don't call aio_complete() in ext4_end_io_dio(), but
> instead the conversion is queued via a call to ext4_add_compete_io(),
> and and aio_done() is only called on the iocb after the conversion is
> complete.
> 
> Can anyone see something that I might be missing?
> 
>     	       		      	      - Ted
> 
> P.S.  Zhao, what was the hardware that you using to find this failure?
> I'm not seeing it, but then again if the failure is only happening
> once every few hundred runs that might explain it.  I'm perhaps
> wondering if we should add a mode to aio-dio-hole-filling-race.c which
> allows it to try the race a large number of times, instead of just
> once.
> 
> P.P.S.  One thought.... perhaps it might be useful to have a debug
> mode where we use queue_delayed_work() to submit the conversion
> request to the workqueue.  It will of course make certain workloads
> run slow as molasses, but it might expose some races so we can see
> them more easily.
> 
> .
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-30  3:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-08  3:13 xfstests failure generic/239 Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-08 22:30 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-09  2:37   ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-09  3:29     ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-09  4:42       ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-25  7:18   ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-07-30  3:28   ` Zhao Hongjiang [this message]
2013-07-30 15:48     ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  2:42       ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-07-31 14:13         ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  2:05           ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-08-01  8:49             ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  9:10               ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 10:28                 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-08-01  9:28               ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-08-01 21:03                 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51F732FA.9090307@huawei.com \
    --to=zhaohongjiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).