From: Zhao Hongjiang <zhaohongjiang@huawei.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <hch@lst.de>, <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Subject: Re: xfstests failure generic/239
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:28:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F732FA.9090307@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130608223038.GA19229@thunk.org>
Hi, jack
I test the latest kernel 3.11-rc2 and it seems the problem is fix by the follow patch:
commit id:97a851ed71cd9cc2542955e92a001c6ea3d21d35 (ext4: use io_end for multiple bios).
But it's so difficult to backport to kernel 3.4-stable, any suggestion for this?
Regards,
Zhao
On 2013/6/9 6:30, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 11:13:35AM +0800, Zhao Hongjiang wrote:
>>
>> I run xfstests #239 against mainline 3.10.0-rc3, unfortunately it failure in my QEMU. I run the
>> case a hundred times, it certainly hit the failure several times. The failure msg is as follow:
>>
>> FSTYP -- ext4
>> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 3.10.0-rc3-mainline
>>
>> generic/239 1s ... - output mismatch (see /home/zhj/xfstests/results/generic/239.out.bad)
>> --- tests/generic/239.out 2013-06-07 22:04:09.000000000 -0400
>> +++ /home/zff/xfstests/results/generic/239.out.bad 2013-06-07 22:04:09.000000000 -0400
>> @@ -1,2 +1,515 @@
>> QA output created by 239
>> +hostname: Host name lookup failure
>
> OK, so this hostname failure is weird; I'm not sure what's causing
> this, but this I presume unrelated to the failure at hand.
>
>> Silence is golden
>> +0: 0x0
>> +1: 0x0
>> +2: 0x0
>> +3: 0x0
>
> This indicates a problem. Test generic/239 is running
> aio-dio-hole-filling-race.c, which submits an asynchronous, direct I/O
> 4k write with a buffer containing non-zero contents to a sparse file,
> and once the I/O has completed, it uses pread to read it back, using
> the same descriptor, so it is doing the read using direct I/O. It
> then checks to see if the read returns zero or not.
>
> The "XX: 0x0" lines indicates that buffer is zero, which implies that
> somehow aio_complete() is getting called before the uninitialized to
> initialized conversion is taking place. I'm not seeing how this is
> happening, though, so I'm a bit puzzled. If there are any unwritten
> extents, we don't call aio_complete() in ext4_end_io_dio(), but
> instead the conversion is queued via a call to ext4_add_compete_io(),
> and and aio_done() is only called on the iocb after the conversion is
> complete.
>
> Can anyone see something that I might be missing?
>
> - Ted
>
> P.S. Zhao, what was the hardware that you using to find this failure?
> I'm not seeing it, but then again if the failure is only happening
> once every few hundred runs that might explain it. I'm perhaps
> wondering if we should add a mode to aio-dio-hole-filling-race.c which
> allows it to try the race a large number of times, instead of just
> once.
>
> P.P.S. One thought.... perhaps it might be useful to have a debug
> mode where we use queue_delayed_work() to submit the conversion
> request to the workqueue. It will of course make certain workloads
> run slow as molasses, but it might expose some races so we can see
> them more easily.
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-08 3:13 xfstests failure generic/239 Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-08 22:30 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-09 2:37 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-09 3:29 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-09 4:42 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-25 7:18 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-07-30 3:28 ` Zhao Hongjiang [this message]
2013-07-30 15:48 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31 2:42 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-07-31 14:13 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 2:05 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-08-01 8:49 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 9:10 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 10:28 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-08-01 9:28 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-08-01 21:03 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F732FA.9090307@huawei.com \
--to=zhaohongjiang@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).