From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Wang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com>,
Shuichi Ihara <sihara@ddn.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: introduce EXT4_BG_WAS_TRIMMED to optimize trim
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 11:32:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520b260b-13e9-4c62-eaeb-c44215b14089@thelounge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200527091938.647363ekmnz7av7y@work>
Am 27.05.20 um 11:19 schrieb Lukas Czerner:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:38:50PM +0900, Wang Shilong wrote:
>> From: Wang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com>
>>
>> Currently WAS_TRIMMED flag is not persistent, whenever filesystem was
>> remounted, fstrim need walk all block groups again, the problem with
>> this is FSTRIM could be slow on very large LUN SSD based filesystem.
>>
>> To avoid this kind of problem, we introduce a block group flag
>> EXT4_BG_WAS_TRIMMED, the side effect of this is we need introduce
>> extra one block group dirty write after trimming block group.
would that also fix the issue that *way too much* is trimmed all the
time, no matter if it's a thin provisioned vmware disk or a phyiscal
RAID10 with SSD
no way of 315 MB deletes within 2 hours or so on a system with just 485M
used
[root@firewall:~]$ fstrim -av
/boot: 0 B (0 bytes) trimmed on /dev/sda1
/: 315.2 MiB (330522624 bytes) trimmed on /dev/sdb1
[root@firewall:~]$ df
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 ext4 5.8G 463M 5.4G 8% /
/dev/sda1 ext4 485M 42M 440M 9% /boot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-27 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 7:38 [PATCH] ext4: introduce EXT4_BG_WAS_TRIMMED to optimize trim Wang Shilong
2020-05-27 9:19 ` Lukas Czerner
2020-05-27 9:32 ` Reindl Harald [this message]
2020-05-27 9:57 ` Lukas Czerner
2020-05-27 10:11 ` Reindl Harald
2020-05-27 10:32 ` Lukas Czerner
2020-05-27 10:56 ` Reindl Harald
2020-05-27 19:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2020-05-27 10:06 ` Wang Shilong
2020-05-27 10:21 ` Lukas Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520b260b-13e9-4c62-eaeb-c44215b14089@thelounge.net \
--to=h.reindl@thelounge.net \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sihara@ddn.com \
--cc=wangshilong1991@gmail.com \
--cc=wshilong@ddn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox