From: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linux NFS mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:21:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521E318C.7040401@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130827180655.GE14809@fieldses.org>
On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote:
>>>> so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or at least its reboot functionality got broken
>>>> - if the NFS server is hammered with scary NFS calls using a fuzzy tool running at a remote NFS client under a non-privileged user id.
>>>>
>>>> It can re reproduced, if
>>>> - the NFS share is an EXT3 or EXT4 directory
>>>> - and it is created at file located at tempfs and mounted via loop device
>>>> - and the NFS server is forced to umount the NFS share
>>>> - and the server forced to restart the NSF service afterwards
>>>> - and trinity is used
>>>>
>>>> I could find a scenario for an automated bisect. 2 times it brought this commit
>>>> commit 68a3396178e6688ad7367202cdf0af8ed03c8727
>>>> Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
>>>> Date: Thu Mar 21 11:21:50 2013 -0400
>>>>
>>>> nfsd4: shut down more of delegation earlier
>>
>> Thanks for the report. I think I see the problem--after this commit
>> nfs4_set_delegation() failures result in nfs4_put_delegation being
>> called, but nfs4_put_delegation doesn't free the nfs4_file that has
>> already been set by alloc_init_deleg().
>>
>> Let me think about how to fix that....
>
> Sorry for the slow response--can you check whether this fixes the
> problem?
>
Yes.
With the attached patch the problem can't be reproduced any longer with
the prepared test case and current git kernels.
> --b.
>
> commit 624a0ee0375940ce4aa36330b0b5a70af6d2b6f5
> Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu Aug 15 16:55:26 2013 -0400
>
> nfsd4: fix leak of inode reference on delegation failure
>
> This fixes a regression from 68a3396178e6688ad7367202cdf0af8ed03c8727
> "nfsd4: shut down more of delegation earlier".
>
> After that commit, nfs4_set_delegation() failures result in
> nfs4_put_delegation being called, but nfs4_put_delegation doesn't free
> the nfs4_file that has already been set by alloc_init_deleg().
>
> This can result in an oops on later unmounting the exported filesystem.
>
> Note also delaying the fi_had_conflict check we're able to return a
> better error (hence give 4.1 clients a better idea why the delegation
> failed; though note CONFLICT isn't an exact match here, as that's
> supposed to indicate a current conflict, but all we know here is that
> there was one recently).
>
> Reported-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index eb9cf81..0874998 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -368,11 +368,8 @@ static struct nfs4_delegation *
> alloc_init_deleg(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct svc_fh *current_fh)
> {
> struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
> - struct nfs4_file *fp = stp->st_file;
>
> dprintk("NFSD alloc_init_deleg\n");
> - if (fp->fi_had_conflict)
> - return NULL;
> if (num_delegations > max_delegations)
> return NULL;
> dp = delegstateid(nfs4_alloc_stid(clp, deleg_slab));
> @@ -389,8 +386,7 @@ alloc_init_deleg(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct sv
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dp->dl_perfile);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dp->dl_perclnt);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> - get_nfs4_file(fp);
> - dp->dl_file = fp;
> + dp->dl_file = NULL;
> dp->dl_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_READ;
> fh_copy_shallow(&dp->dl_fh, ¤t_fh->fh_handle);
> dp->dl_time = 0;
> @@ -3044,22 +3040,35 @@ static int nfs4_setlease(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> +static int nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp, struct nfs4_file *fp)
> {
> - struct nfs4_file *fp = dp->dl_file;
> + int status;
>
> - if (!fp->fi_lease)
> - return nfs4_setlease(dp);
> + if (fp->fi_had_conflict)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + get_nfs4_file(fp);
> + dp->dl_file = fp;
> + if (!fp->fi_lease) {
> + status = nfs4_setlease(dp);
> + if (status)
> + goto out_free;
> + return 0;
> + }
> spin_lock(&recall_lock);
> if (fp->fi_had_conflict) {
> spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
> - return -EAGAIN;
> + status = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out_free;
> }
> atomic_inc(&fp->fi_delegees);
> list_add(&dp->dl_perfile, &fp->fi_delegations);
> spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
> list_add(&dp->dl_perclnt, &dp->dl_stid.sc_client->cl_delegations);
> return 0;
> +out_free:
> + put_nfs4_file(fp);
> + dp->dl_file = fp;
> + return status;
> }
>
> static void nfsd4_open_deleg_none_ext(struct nfsd4_open *open, int status)
> @@ -3134,7 +3143,7 @@ nfs4_open_delegation(struct net *net, struct svc_fh *fh,
> dp = alloc_init_deleg(oo->oo_owner.so_client, stp, fh);
> if (dp == NULL)
> goto out_no_deleg;
> - status = nfs4_set_delegation(dp);
> + status = nfs4_set_delegation(dp, stp->st_file);
> if (status)
> goto out_free;
>
>
--
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf Förster
pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-28 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-11 9:48 Issues with a rather unusual configured NFS server Toralf Förster
[not found] ` <52075E01.7030506-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-12 14:36 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-13 21:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-08-14 16:44 ` Toralf Förster
2013-08-27 18:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-08-28 17:21 ` Toralf Förster [this message]
2013-08-29 9:57 ` [uml-devel] " richard -rw- weinberger
2013-08-29 13:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20130829133010.GA14773-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-30 14:10 ` Toralf Förster
2013-08-30 14:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-08-30 14:36 ` Richard Weinberger
[not found] ` <CAFLxGvyK5+nB9TgW1uPho9KGwQrWQHx=wEpj+o-mZcN92bWAOg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-30 18:27 ` Michael Richardson
2013-09-07 20:44 ` Toralf Förster
[not found] ` <522B9010.8070902-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-07 20:51 ` [uml-devel] " richard -rw- weinberger
2013-09-10 14:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20130910140937.GD16011-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-10 15:51 ` Toralf Förster
2013-09-22 16:58 ` Toralf Förster
2013-09-23 17:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20130923174129.GA19720-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-02 20:29 ` Toralf Förster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521E318C.7040401@gmx.de \
--to=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).