From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mke2fs: print a message when creating a regular file
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 09:46:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5367A445.9070209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140505135239.GB22287@thunk.org>
On 5/5/14, 8:52 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 03:41:01PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 May 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 09:04:02 -0400
>>> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
>>> To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mke2fs: print a message when creating a regular file
>>
>> Description is missing.
>
> I didn't think more of a description was needed; can you suggest one?
Well, sometimes the summary is enough - if this patch just added a printf,
the summary covers the functional change. However, I think it's useful
to see the rationale for a change, not just the description of the change.
"Close file descriptors before exit" doesn't really need any rationale,
but changing program behavior and/or output might.
AFAIK, nobody ever complained that a changelog was too descriptive or
informative. ;)
>>> /* Can't undo discard ... */
>>> - if (!noaction && discard && (io_ptr != undo_io_manager)) {
>>> + if (!noaction && discard && dev_size && (io_ptr != undo_io_manager)) {
>>
>> I wonder whether it's possible not to have dev_size set at this point ?
>
> I checked, and I don't believe so. ext2fs_get_device_size2() never
> returns EXT2_ET_UNIMPLEMENTED any more; and it hasn't for quite some
> time, since it will use st_size for a regular file or do a binary
> search trying to figure out the device size in the worst case. So in
> fact, there are some code paths we can eliminate in misc/mke2fs.c
> which will simplify this analysis.
>
> Even if there is some case in the future where dev_size could be left
> unset, it will be initialized to zero, at which point we will fail
> safe by skipping the mke2fs_discard_device() call.
I kind of lost the thread here; if it is impossible to be unset, why
add the check?
And if (!dev_size) what would happen on this path? I guess I need to get
all the pending patches applied to see what's changed in this area.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-05 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 13:04 [PATCH 1/3] mke2fs: print a message when creating a regular file Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 13:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] mke2fs: print extra information about existing ext2/3/4 file systems Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 13:45 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:17 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:38 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:51 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 16:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2014-05-05 17:50 ` Karel Zak
2014-05-05 18:32 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-06 7:44 ` Karel Zak
2014-05-05 16:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2014-05-05 13:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] mke2fs: check for a partition table and warn if present Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 13:52 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 13:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:11 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-06 12:20 ` Karel Zak
2014-05-06 12:52 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] mke2fs: print a message when creating a regular file Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 13:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 14:04 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-05 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-05-05 14:49 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5367A445.9070209@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).