From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@interlinx.bc.ca>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: e2scrub finds corruption immediately after mounting
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 16:14:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536d25b24364eaf11a38b47e853008c3115d82b8.camel@interlinx.bc.ca> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2587 bytes --]
I am trying to migrate from lvcheck
(https://github.com/BryanKadzban/lvcheck) to using the officially
supported e2scrub[_all] kit.
I am finding that e2scrub very often (much more than lvcheck even)
finds corruption and wants me to do an offline e2fsck. Not only does
it do this immediately after booting a system that includes filesystem
checks (that were caused by e2scrub previously setting a filesystem to
be checked on next boot), but it happens immediately after I run an
e2fsck and then mount the filesystem, even without any activity on it.
Observe:
# umount /opt
# e2fsck -y /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt
e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
/dev/mapper/rootvol_tmp-almalinux8_opt: clean, 1698/178816 files,
482404/716800 blocks
# e2scrub /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt
Logical volume "almalinux8_opt.e2scrub" created.
e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt.e2scrub: 1698/178816 files (86.9% non-
contiguous), 482404/716800 blocks
/dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt: Scrub succeeded.
tune2fs 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
Setting current mount count to 0
Setting time filesystem last checked to Wed Jan 3 11:37:04 2024
Logical volume "almalinux8_opt.e2scrub" successfully removed.
# mount /opt
# e2scrub /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt
Logical volume "almalinux8_opt.e2scrub" created.
e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt.e2scrub: 1698/178816 files (86.9% non-
contiguous), 482404/716800 blocks
/dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt: Scrub FAILED due to corruption!
Unmount and run e2fsck -y.
tune2fs 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
Setting filesystem error flag to force fsck.
Logical volume "almalinux8_opt.e2scrub" successfully removed.
So as you can see, I unmount /opt, run an e2fsck -y on it to clean it
and then before mounting run e2scrub and it finds the filesystem clean.
Good so far.
I then mount it and then immediately run another e2scrub on it and that
finds it dirty and wants me to unmount and run another e2fsck -y on it.
But how can that be? Surely an e2scrub on a freshly cleaned and
mounted filesystem (with no activity on it in between) should be clean,
yes?
Cheers,
b.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 21:14 Brian J. Murrell [this message]
2024-01-04 4:38 ` e2scrub finds corruption immediately after mounting Theodore Ts'o
2024-01-04 14:10 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-04 4:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-04 14:13 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-08 12:52 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-09 6:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-10 5:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-10 13:44 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-10 18:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-10 23:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-01-16 13:29 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-16 13:22 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-17 19:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-01-17 22:20 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-04 14:37 ` Brian J. Murrell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536d25b24364eaf11a38b47e853008c3115d82b8.camel@interlinx.bc.ca \
--to=brian@interlinx.bc.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).