public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Journal under-reservation bug on first >2G file
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:10:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <542B1C38.9010409@redhat.com> (raw)

Hey all -

So the following testcase will overrun the 1-credit journal reservation
made during a delalloc write in ext4_da_write_begin(), because we
may cross the 2G threshold, and need to modify both the inode and the
superblock in the same transaction.

I see a few was to fix this:

1) Always set LARGE_FILE on mount if not set.  This will break
   RW compatiblity with very old kernels.  Do we care?
2) Bump the reservation to 2 under the fiddly condition of
   large file not yet set but this write might do it
3) bump the delalloc reservation to 2 just in case, always

I'll be happy to write the patch to fix it, just wondering what
people think the best approach is

Thoughts?
-Eric


#!/bin/bash

# A 400m fs won't get the large_file feature, oddly
# enough, because the resize inode will be < 2G.

truncate --size=400m test.img
mkfs.ext4 -F test.img
# This shouldn't have large_file set, exit if it does for some reason
dumpe2fs -h test.img | grep large_file && exit

mkdir -p mnt
mount -o loop test.img mnt

echo "writing 1 byte at 2147483646" 
dd if=/dev/zero of=mnt/testfile bs=1 seek=2147483646 count=1 conv=notrunc of=mnt/testfile
sync

# This will make sure i_disksize is on disk, and
# that the buffer will be mapped on the next write.
#
# This is critical because ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize()
# checks buffer_mapped():
#
#        if (!buffer_mapped(bh) || (buffer_delay(bh)) || buffer_unwritten(bh))
#                return 0;
#        return 1;

# This tries to update i_disksize, and also requires a superblock
# update for the large_file feature flag, but only has 1 credit
# available on the delalloc write path

echo "writing 1 byte at 2147483647"
dd if=/dev/zero of=mnt/testfile bs=1 seek=2147483647 count=1 conv=notrunc of=mnt/testfile

# Should go boom, but if not, unmount
umount mnt

             reply	other threads:[~2014-09-30 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-30 21:10 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-09-30 21:22 ` Journal under-reservation bug on first >2G file Eric Sandeen
2014-09-30 21:36   ` Andreas Dilger
2014-09-30 22:10     ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-10-01 11:53     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-01 14:43       ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-01 19:59         ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-01 20:37           ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-01 22:43             ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-02  5:49               ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-02 11:26                 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=542B1C38.9010409@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox