From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>
To: Austin Schuh <austin@peloton-tech.com>, <pavel@pavlinux.ru>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
<linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <tytso@mit.edu>,
<adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RT/ext4/jbd2 circular dependency
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:57:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544EA39A.1080005@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <544940EF.7090907@windriver.com>
On 10/23/2014 11:54 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Basically it looks like we have a circular dependency involving the
> inode->i_data_sem rt_mutex, the PG_writeback bit, and the BJ_Shadow list. It
> goes something like this:
>
> jbd2_journal_commit_transaction:
> 1) set page for writeback (set PG_writeback bit)
> 2) put jbd2 journal head on BJ_Shadow list
> 3) sleep on PG_writeback bit waiting for page writeback complete
>
> ext4_da_writepages:
> 1) ext4_map_blocks() acquires inode->i_data_sem for writing
> 2) do_get_write_access() sleeps waiting for jbd2 journal head to come off
> the BJ_Shadow list
>
> At this point the flush code can't run because it can't acquire
> inode->i_data_sem for reading, so the page will never get written out.
> Deadlock.
Just curious...would we expect lockdep to detect this sort of thing? I
wasn't sure if the introduction of the two wait queues would cause
complications.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-27 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-17 17:50 Hang writing to nfs-mounted filesystem from client, all nfsd tasks on server blocked in D Chris Friesen
2014-10-17 18:01 ` Pavel Vasilyev
[not found] ` <CANGgnMbQmsdMDJUx7Bop9Xs=jQMmAJgWRjhXVFUGx-DwF=inYw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-23 17:54 ` RT/ext4/jbd2 circular dependency (was: Re: Hang writing to nfs-mounted filesystem from client) Chris Friesen
2014-10-26 14:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-27 16:22 ` RT/ext4/jbd2 circular dependency Chris Friesen
2014-10-29 18:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-29 19:11 ` Chris Friesen
2014-10-29 19:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-29 20:17 ` Chris Friesen
2014-10-29 20:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-29 23:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-29 23:37 ` Chris Friesen
2014-10-30 1:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-30 8:15 ` Kevin Liao
2014-10-30 12:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-30 21:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 23:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-31 0:08 ` Chris Friesen
2014-10-31 0:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-13 19:06 ` Jan Kara
2014-10-27 19:57 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
[not found] ` <544156FE.7070905-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-17 18:58 ` Hang writing to nfs-mounted filesystem from client, all nfsd tasks on server blocked in D Austin Schuh
2014-10-17 19:12 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2014-10-18 17:05 ` Hang writing to nfs-mounted filesystem from client -- expected code path? Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544EA39A.1080005@windriver.com \
--to=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=austin@peloton-tech.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@pavlinux.ru \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).