From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: very slow SSD with fsync
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:33:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55033BA5.9000806@smop.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150313152559.GB21922@thunk.org>
On 13/03/15 15:25, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> The obvious thing to do is to try using blktrace to see which I/O
> operations are triggering the problem. It may just be that the hard
> drive's internal FTL metadata is very badly fragmented.
Damn :-( Seems a bit odd as it's only a few months old (not used much)
and OSX _seems_ fine.
Not quite sure what to look for in blktrace. I see the sync but the
timestamps in blktrace are near instantaneous vs 1.3, 2.2 seconds
reported by strace. Trying a "find" and watching it stall blktrace
shows this - which to my amateur eyes shows a 0.5s gap between the read
request at 1.815589 and being issued at 2.373. Two completions being
the only occurrence in the middle. Maybe queue depth was full - but we
have a two completions earlier.
8,0 0 226 1.812363080 271 D WS 498955904 + 16 (
988) [jbd2
/dm-0-8]
8,0 0 227 1.812439052 0 C WS 498955904 + 16 (
75972) [0]
8,4 0 228 1.812456484 271 A FWS 0 + 0 <- (252,0) 0
8,0 0 229 1.812456838 271 Q FWS [jbd2/dm-0-8]
8,4 0 230 1.812457124 271 A FWS 0 + 0 <- (252,0) 0
8,0 0 231 1.812457237 271 Q FWS [jbd2/dm-0-8]
8,0 0 232 1.812458007 271 G FWS [jbd2/dm-0-8]
8,0 0 233 1.812458478 271 I FWS ( 471) [jbd2/dm-0-8]
8,0 0 234 1.812465182 271 G FWS [jbd2/dm-0-8]
8,0 0 235 1.812465316 271 I FWS ( 134) [jbd2/dm-0-8]
8,0 0 236 1.815446245 0 C RM 507106648 + 8 (
3778637) [0]
8,4 2 11 1.815585457 31072 A RM 16875872 + 8 <-
(252,0) 1687382
4
8,0 2 12 1.815585633 31072 A RM 507107680 + 8 <- (8,4)
16875872
8,0 2 13 1.815586124 31072 Q RM 507107680 + 8 [find]
8,0 2 14 1.815588326 31072 G RM 507107680 + 8 [find]
8,0 2 15 1.815589269 31072 I RM 507107680 + 8 ( 943)
[find]
8,0 0 237 1.830102994 0 C WS 0 (17739914) [0]
8,0 0 238 2.373458367 0 C WS 0 [0]
8,0 0 239 2.373469557 0 D RM 507107680 + 8
(557880288) [swap
per/0]
8,4 0 240 2.373486949 15158 A WFS 8724112 + 8 <- (252,0)
8722064
8,0 0 241 2.373487336 15158 A WFS 498955920 + 8 <- (8,4)
8724112
8,0 0 242 2.373488480 15158 Q WFS 498955920 + 8
[kworker/0:2]
8,0 0 243 2.373490158 15158 G WFS 498955920 + 8
[kworker/0:2]
8,0 0 244 2.373491573 15158 I WFS 498955920 + 8 ( 1415)
[kwork
er/0:2]
8,0 0 245 2.373491927 15158 D WS 498955920 + 8 ( 354)
[kworker/0:2]
8,0 0 246 2.373596570 0 C WS 498955920 + 8 (
104643) [0]
8,0 0 247 2.375251869 0 C RM 507107680 + 8 (
1782312) [0]
8,4 2 16 2.375452116 31072 A RM 16875072 + 8 <-
(252,0) 16873024
8,0 2 17 2.375452283 31072 A RM 507106880 + 8 <- (8,4)
16875072
8,0 2 18 2.375452776 31072 Q RM 507106880 + 8 [find]
I'm looking at 'watch -n0 cat /proc/diskstats |egrep -v "ram|loop"'
and it's normally sat down at 0/1 for I/Os in progress (have seen hit
100 _briefly_ and then drop just as quickly).
> What model SSD is it, by the way?
It's the built-in Apple MBP 512GB drive - "APPLE SSD SM0512F" which
apparently means Samsung (I've been reading about issues with their
840EVO drives...
Thanks once again (and for all your immense work over the many, many years!)
Adrian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 14:48 very slow SSD with fsync Adrian Bridgett
2015-03-13 15:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-03-13 19:33 ` Adrian Bridgett [this message]
2015-03-15 14:35 ` Dmitry Monakhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55033BA5.9000806@smop.co.uk \
--to=adrian@smop.co.uk \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox