From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Marian Marinov <mm@1h.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: Do not wait for page writeback for GFP_NOFS allocations
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:30:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5593F98C.4010406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150701133715.GA6287@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 07/01/2015 09:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Fix this issue by limiting the wait to reclaim triggered by __GFP_FS
> allocations to make sure we are not called from filesystem paths which
> might be doing exactly this kind of IO optimizations. The page fault
> path, which is the only path that triggers memcg oom killer since 3.12,
> shouldn't require GFP_NOFS and so we shouldn't reintroduce the premature
> OOM killer issue which was originally addressed by the heuristic.
>
> As per David Chinner the xfs is doing similar thing since 2.6.15 already
> so ext4 is not the only affected filesystem. Moreover he notes:
> : For example: IO completion might require unwritten extent conversion
> : which executes filesystem transactions and GFP_NOFS allocations. The
> : writeback flag on the pages can not be cleared until unwritten
> : extent conversion completes. Hence memory reclaim cannot wait on
> : page writeback to complete in GFP_NOFS context because it is not
> : safe to do so, memcg reclaim or otherwise.
I remember fixing something like this back in the 2.2
days. Funny how these bugs keep coming back.
> Cc: stable # 3.6+
> Fixes: c3b94f44fcb0 ("memcg: further prevent OOM with too many dirty pages")
> Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-01 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 15:17 [PATCH] mm, vmscan: Do not wait for page writeback for GFP_NOFS allocations Michal Hocko
2015-07-01 6:17 ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-01 13:37 ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-01 14:30 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-07-02 14:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-07-02 15:13 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-04 6:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-08-04 9:51 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-04 21:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-08-04 21:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-08-07 7:52 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-08-13 2:13 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5593F98C.4010406@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kernel@kyup.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mm@1h.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).