linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Linux Kernel Mailing List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 4.1: 9a0e609e3fd ("dm: only run the queue on completion if ....") causes significant overhead in osq_lock on ext4/multipath
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:37:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559CE14E.7010209@de.ibm.com> (raw)

not sure if this actually a mutex/s390/dm or ext4 problem, but it bisects down to a dm commit:

Mike,

commit 9a0e609e3fd8a95c96629b9fbde6b8c5b9a1456a ("dm: only run the queue on 
completion if congested or no requests pending") causes a significant overhead
if multiple processes access the same file on an ext4 file system on multipath,
with direct io.

This actually appeared first with a kvm guest that has I/O on 500 virtio disks that
are backed up by the same image file (I used this to test something else)

but something like the following (without kvm)

for ((d=1; d<500; d++)); do  dd if=fileonmultipathext4 of=/dev/null bs=4096 iflag=direct & done

keeps most CPUs on the osq_lock (optimistic spinning for mutex)

# Overhead  Command         Shared Object        Symbol                                     
# ........  ..............  ...................  ...........................................
#
    73.91%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] osq_lock                               
     3.15%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.isra.5             
     3.03%  swapper         [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] osq_lock                               
     1.08%  kdmwork-252:28  [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] osq_lock                               
     0.91%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] arch_spin_lock_wait_flags              
     0.36%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] kmem_cache_free                        
     0.29%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] account_system_time                    
     0.25%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] __blockdev_direct_IO                   
     0.25%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] _mix_pool_bytes                        
     0.22%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] __schedule                             
     0.22%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] pcpu_ec_call                           
     0.21%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] enqueue_entity                         
     0.18%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] vtime_account_irq_enter                
     0.17%  dd              [dm_multipath]       [k] multipath_status                       
     0.17%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] try_to_wake_up                         
     0.17%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] update_cfs_shares                      
     0.16%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]     [k] blk_update_request  

With that patch reverted the system is much less contendent on osq_lock

# Overhead  Command         Shared Object      Symbol                                     
# ........  ..............  .................  ...........................................
#
    30.22%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] osq_lock                               
     5.57%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.isra.5             
     5.48%  swapper         [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] osq_lock                               
     1.61%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] arch_spin_lock_wait_flags              
     1.38%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] arch_spin_lock_wait                    
     1.17%  swapper         [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.isra.5             
     0.67%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] kmem_cache_free                        
     0.63%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] try_to_wake_up                         
     0.63%  kdmwork-252:22  [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] osq_lock                               
     0.57%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] _mix_pool_bytes                        
     0.57%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] account_system_time                    
     0.49%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] pcpu_ec_call                           
     0.48%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] vtime_account_irq_enter                
     0.44%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] zfcp_fsf_reqid_check                   
     0.42%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] __blockdev_direct_IO                   
     0.42%  dd              [kernel.vmlinux]   [k] enqueue_entity    


Do you have any idea why this patch seems to affect mutex/sem hold times?

Christian

             reply	other threads:[~2015-07-08  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08  8:37 Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2015-07-08 13:57 ` 4.1: 9a0e609e3fd ("dm: only run the queue on completion if ....") causes significant overhead in osq_lock on ext4/multipath Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559CE14E.7010209@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).