From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Linux Kernel Mailing List"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 4.1: 9a0e609e3fd ("dm: only run the queue on completion if ....") causes significant overhead in osq_lock on ext4/multipath
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:37:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559CE14E.7010209@de.ibm.com> (raw)
not sure if this actually a mutex/s390/dm or ext4 problem, but it bisects down to a dm commit:
Mike,
commit 9a0e609e3fd8a95c96629b9fbde6b8c5b9a1456a ("dm: only run the queue on
completion if congested or no requests pending") causes a significant overhead
if multiple processes access the same file on an ext4 file system on multipath,
with direct io.
This actually appeared first with a kvm guest that has I/O on 500 virtio disks that
are backed up by the same image file (I used this to test something else)
but something like the following (without kvm)
for ((d=1; d<500; d++)); do dd if=fileonmultipathext4 of=/dev/null bs=4096 iflag=direct & done
keeps most CPUs on the osq_lock (optimistic spinning for mutex)
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ .............. ................... ...........................................
#
73.91% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock
3.15% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.isra.5
3.03% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock
1.08% kdmwork-252:28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock
0.91% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] arch_spin_lock_wait_flags
0.36% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] kmem_cache_free
0.29% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] account_system_time
0.25% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __blockdev_direct_IO
0.25% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] _mix_pool_bytes
0.22% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __schedule
0.22% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] pcpu_ec_call
0.21% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] enqueue_entity
0.18% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] vtime_account_irq_enter
0.17% dd [dm_multipath] [k] multipath_status
0.17% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] try_to_wake_up
0.17% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_shares
0.16% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] blk_update_request
With that patch reverted the system is much less contendent on osq_lock
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ .............. ................. ...........................................
#
30.22% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock
5.57% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.isra.5
5.48% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock
1.61% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] arch_spin_lock_wait_flags
1.38% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] arch_spin_lock_wait
1.17% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.isra.5
0.67% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] kmem_cache_free
0.63% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] try_to_wake_up
0.63% kdmwork-252:22 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock
0.57% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] _mix_pool_bytes
0.57% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] account_system_time
0.49% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] pcpu_ec_call
0.48% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] vtime_account_irq_enter
0.44% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] zfcp_fsf_reqid_check
0.42% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __blockdev_direct_IO
0.42% dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] enqueue_entity
Do you have any idea why this patch seems to affect mutex/sem hold times?
Christian
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-08 8:37 Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2015-07-08 13:57 ` 4.1: 9a0e609e3fd ("dm: only run the queue on completion if ....") causes significant overhead in osq_lock on ext4/multipath Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559CE14E.7010209@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).