From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Stu Mark <smark@datto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't manipulate recovery flag when freezing no-journal fs
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:10:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C3A332.30408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C28AA6.6070606@redhat.com>
On 8/5/15 3:13 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> At some point along this sequence of changes:
>
> f6e63f9 ext4: fold ext4_nojournal_sops into ext4_sops
> bb04457 ext4: support freezing ext2 (nojournal) file systems
> 9ca9238 ext4: Use separate super_operations structure for no_journal filesystems
>
> ext4 started setting needs_recovery on filesystems without journals
> when they are unfrozen. This makes no sense, and in fact confuses
> blkid to the point where it doesn't recognize the filesystem at all.
>
> (freeze ext2; unfreeze ext2; run blkid; see no output; run dumpe2fs,
> see needs_recovery set on fs w/ no journal).
>
> To fix this, don't manipulate the INCOMPAT_RECOVER feature on
> filesystems without journals.
Ted, if this passes review you might cc: stable on the commit as well.
Thanks,
-Eric
> Reported-by: Stu Mark <smark@datto.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Note, is there a reason that in ext4_freeze, if journal_flush
> fails, we skip the ext4_commit_super call? I didn't change that
> here, but it seems odd.
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 58987b5..e7b345d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -4833,10 +4833,11 @@ static int ext4_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
> error = jbd2_journal_flush(journal);
> if (error < 0)
> goto out;
> +
> + /* Journal blocked and flushed, clear needs_recovery flag. */
> + EXT4_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
> }
>
> - /* Journal blocked and flushed, clear needs_recovery flag. */
> - EXT4_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
> error = ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
> out:
> if (journal)
> @@ -4854,8 +4855,11 @@ static int ext4_unfreeze(struct super_block *sb)
> if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
> return 0;
>
> - /* Reset the needs_recovery flag before the fs is unlocked. */
> - EXT4_SET_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
> + if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal) {
> + /* Reset the needs_recovery flag before the fs is unlocked. */
> + EXT4_SET_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
> + }
> +
> ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 22:13 [PATCH] ext4: don't manipulate recovery flag when freezing no-journal fs Eric Sandeen
2015-08-06 18:10 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-08-11 19:22 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-15 14:50 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C3A332.30408@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smark@datto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).