From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] resize2fs: clear uninit BG if allocating from new group
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:42:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FB41CA.8010003@redhat.com> (raw)
If resize2fs_get_alloc_block() allocates from a BLOCK_UNINIT
group, nothing clears the UNINIT flag, so it is skipped when we
go to write out modified bitmaps. This leads to post-resize2fs
e2fsck errors; used blocks in UNINIT groups, not marked in the
block bitmap.
This shamelessly cuts & pastes clear_block_uninit() into
resize2fs.c, and my problem goes away.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
I've kind of lost the thread on resize2fs lately, so maybe this is
a hack job? At least it highlights the issue, even if it's not
quite right. Passes "make check" here and seems ok to me...
Thanks,
-Eric
diff --git a/resize/resize2fs.c b/resize/resize2fs.c
index 07c6a0c..0f202bd 100644
--- a/resize/resize2fs.c
+++ b/resize/resize2fs.c
@@ -1614,12 +1614,27 @@ static blk64_t get_new_block(ext2_resize_t rfs)
}
}
+static void clear_block_uninit(ext2_filsys fs, dgrp_t group)
+{
+ if (!ext2fs_has_group_desc_csum(fs) ||
+ !(ext2fs_bg_flags_test(fs, group, EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT)))
+ return;
+
+ /* uninit block bitmaps are now initialized in read_bitmaps() */
+
+ ext2fs_bg_flags_clear(fs, group, EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT);
+ ext2fs_group_desc_csum_set(fs, group);
+ ext2fs_mark_super_dirty(fs);
+ ext2fs_mark_bb_dirty(fs);
+}
+
static errcode_t resize2fs_get_alloc_block(ext2_filsys fs,
blk64_t goal EXT2FS_ATTR((unused)),
blk64_t *ret)
{
ext2_resize_t rfs = (ext2_resize_t) fs->priv_data;
blk64_t blk;
+ int group;
blk = get_new_block(rfs);
if (!blk)
@@ -1632,6 +1647,12 @@ static errcode_t resize2fs_get_alloc_block(ext2_filsys fs,
ext2fs_mark_block_bitmap2(rfs->old_fs->block_map, blk);
ext2fs_mark_block_bitmap2(rfs->new_fs->block_map, blk);
+
+ group = ext2fs_group_of_blk2(rfs->old_fs, blk);
+ clear_block_uninit(rfs->old_fs, group);
+ group = ext2fs_group_of_blk2(rfs->new_fs, blk);
+ clear_block_uninit(rfs->new_fs, group);
+
*ret = (blk64_t) blk;
return 0;
}
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-17 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-17 22:42 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-09-17 23:55 ` [PATCH] resize2fs: clear uninit BG if allocating from new group Darrick J. Wong
2015-09-18 0:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-09-18 3:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-01-14 14:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-01-14 17:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2016-01-14 18:46 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2016-01-14 18:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-01-14 19:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-01-14 19:27 ` [PATCH V3] " Eric Sandeen
2016-01-14 19:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-01-14 19:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2016-01-14 19:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-02-19 22:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-03-07 2:51 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FB41CA.8010003@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).