linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] resize2fs: clear uninit BG if allocating from new group
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 22:19:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FB82AD.4020302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <196754A4-210B-45E7-837A-7955780208E6@redhat.com>

On 9/17/15 7:54 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:42:18PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> If resize2fs_get_alloc_block() allocates from a BLOCK_UNINIT
>>> group, nothing clears the UNINIT flag, so it is skipped when we
>>> go to write out modified bitmaps.  This leads to post-resize2fs
>>> e2fsck errors; used blocks in UNINIT groups, not marked in the
>>> block bitmap.
>>>
>>> This shamelessly cuts & pastes clear_block_uninit() into
>>> resize2fs.c, and my problem goes away.
>>
>> Hmm... which test was it that exhibited this error?
>>
> r_ext4_small_bg
> 
> Originally it was claimed that only a gcc change exposed it; I'm
> still trying to make sense of that. But the pre-resize image exhibits
> it with any recent resizefs when resized up to 2g as the test does.

I think the only reason the different gcc tweaked the bug is that the
test copies the e2fsck/e2fsck binary into the filesystem under test,
and the size changes depending on the compiler.

I can put up an fs image that exhibits it if you're curious...

-Eric


  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-18  3:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-17 22:42 [PATCH] resize2fs: clear uninit BG if allocating from new group Eric Sandeen
2015-09-17 23:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2015-09-18  0:54   ` Eric Sandeen
2015-09-18  3:19     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2016-01-14 14:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-01-14 17:20   ` Andreas Dilger
2016-01-14 18:46 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2016-01-14 18:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-01-14 19:26     ` Eric Sandeen
2016-01-14 19:27   ` [PATCH V3] " Eric Sandeen
2016-01-14 19:38     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-01-14 19:39     ` Andreas Dilger
2016-01-14 19:57     ` Eric Sandeen
2016-02-19 22:21     ` Eric Sandeen
2016-03-07  2:51     ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55FB82AD.4020302@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).