From: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@huawei.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, linfeilong <linfeilong@huawei.com>,
<louhongxiang@huawei.com>, <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] tune2fs: filesystem inconsistency occurs by concurrent write
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 19:56:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58aea170-bb45-a8d5-a2c7-c4967d02b82b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230626021758.GF8954@mit.edu>
Thanks for your explanation, it's a great idea.
- bin.
On 2023/6/26 10:17, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:00:08AM +0800, zhanchengbin wrote:
>> Tune2fs does not recognize writes to the manipulated filesystem in another
>> namespace, there will be two simultaneous write operations on a
>> block, resulting in filesystem inconsistencies.
>
> What you are reporting has nothing to do with namespaces, since
> "tune2fs -e remount-ro /dev/sdb" is something which is allowed
> regardless of whether the file system is mounted. What reproduction
> is effectively doing is trying to set up a race between when tune2fs
> writes a byte to update to update the errors behavior, and when the
> actual unmount of the file system happens (e.g., when the last
> namespace unmounts the file system). At that point, the kernel is
> going to be updating the superblock as part of the unmount, and then
> it calculates the superblock, and then it writes out the superblock.
>
> If the tune2fs races with the unmount, it's possible for the tune2fs
> update of the error beavhiour bit, and the update of the superblock
> checksum, to race with the kernel's final update of the superblock,
> includinig its attempt to update the checksum.
>
> There are some workarounds to this, but ultimately, we need to replace
> the ad-hoc modification of the block device by tune2fs with some
> ioctls which specifically update superblock when the file system
> mounted. >
> As far as whether or not tune2fs can detect if the file system is
> mounted, what we can do is check to see if the block device is busy.
> If it is mounted in some other namespace, we won't be able to see it
> mounted in /proc/self/mounts, but we can see that it's not possible to
> open the block device with O_EXCL.
>
> Compare:
>
> root@kvm-xfstests:~# /vtmp/tst_ismounted /dev/vdc
> Device /dev/vdc reports flags 31
> /dev/vdc is apparently in use.
> /dev/vdc is mounted.
> /dev/vdc is mounted on /vdc.
>
> and then "unshare -m" in another terminal, followed by umount /dev/vdc
> in the first terminal:
>
> root@kvm-xfstests:~# /vtmp/tst_ismounted /dev/vdc
> Device /dev/vdc reports flags 10
> /dev/vdc is apparently in use.
>
> ... and then after we exit the last mount namespace which was keeping
> /dev/vdc mounted:
>
> root@kvm-xfstests:~# [ 2409.811328] EXT4-fs (vdc): unmounting filesystem bdc026fd-85a8-4ccf-94f8-961487000293.
> root@kvm-xfstests:~# /vtmp/tst_ismounted /dev/vdc
> Device /dev/vdc reports flags 00
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Ted
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-26 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-25 16:00 [bug report] tune2fs: filesystem inconsistency occurs by concurrent write zhanchengbin
2023-06-26 2:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-06-26 11:56 ` zhanchengbin [this message]
2023-07-04 8:35 ` zhanchengbin
2023-07-04 19:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-07-08 7:29 ` zhanchengbin
2023-07-12 0:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-12 9:06 ` zhanchengbin
2023-07-12 15:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58aea170-bb45-a8d5-a2c7-c4967d02b82b@huawei.com \
--to=zhanchengbin1@huawei.com \
--cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com \
--cc=louhongxiang@huawei.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).