linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yebin <yebin10@huawei.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	<linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 4/6] ext4: avoid to re-read mmp check data get from page cache
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 11:52:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <615FC08E.3060301@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211007124422.GI12712@quack2.suse.cz>



On 2021/10/7 20:44, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 11-09-21 17:00:57, Ye Bin wrote:
>> As call read_mmp_block pass bh_check which value is NULL, then call
>> sb_getblk to get buffer_head. But mmp_block's buffer_head is already exist
>>   which also is uptodate. Lead to compare the same data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
> This looks good, except that read_mmp_block() also releases bh it is passed
> in case of error. So it can free buffer head which is still referenced from
> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mmp_bh and cause use-after-free issues.
>
> I guess I would just get rid of sb_getblk() in read_mmp_block() and always
> expect valid bh passed. The only place that passes NULL bh after this
> patch is one case in ext4_multi_mount_protect() and that can call
> sb_getblk() on its own. That way we can also simplify read_mmp_block()
> prototype to:
>
> static int read_mmp_block(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head *bh);
>
> 								Honza
> Yeah, I will refactor 'read_mmp_block'.
>> ---
>>   fs/ext4/mmp.c | 17 ++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mmp.c b/fs/ext4/mmp.c
>> index 4433fe7e9e86..007bde3c12b8 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/mmp.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/mmp.c
>> @@ -213,10 +213,7 @@ static int kmmpd(void *data)
>>   		 * we need to check if the MMP block is as we write it.
>>   		 */
>>   		if (jiffies - last_check_time > mmp_check_interval * HZ) {
>> -			struct buffer_head *bh_check = NULL;
>> -			struct mmp_struct *mmp_check;
>> -
>> -			retval = read_mmp_block(sb, &bh_check, mmp_block);
>> +			retval = read_mmp_block(sb, &bh, mmp_block);
>>   			if (retval) {
>>   				ext4_error_err(sb, -retval,
>>   					       "error reading MMP data: %d",
>> @@ -224,20 +221,18 @@ static int kmmpd(void *data)
>>   				goto wait_to_exit;
>>   			}
>>   
>> -			mmp_check = (struct mmp_struct *)(bh_check->b_data);
>> -			if (seq != mmp_check->mmp_seq ||
>> -			    memcmp(nodename, mmp_check->mmp_nodename,
>> -				   sizeof(mmp->mmp_nodename))) {
>> -				dump_mmp_msg(sb, mmp_check,
>> +			mmp = (struct mmp_struct *)(bh->b_data);
>> +			if (seq != le32_to_cpu(mmp->mmp_seq) ||
>> +			    memcmp(nodename, mmp->mmp_nodename,
>> +				    sizeof(nodename))) {
>> +				dump_mmp_msg(sb, mmp,
>>   					     "Error while updating MMP info. "
>>   					     "The filesystem seems to have been"
>>   					     " multiply mounted.");
>>   				ext4_error_err(sb, EBUSY, "abort");
>> -				put_bh(bh_check);
>>   				retval = -EBUSY;
>>   				goto wait_to_exit;
>>   			}
>> -			put_bh(bh_check);
>>   			last_check_time = jiffies;
>>   		}
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.31.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-08  3:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-11  9:00 [PATCH -next v2 0/6] Fix some issues about mmp Ye Bin
2021-09-11  9:00 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/6] ext4: init seq with random value in kmmpd Ye Bin
2021-10-07 12:26   ` Jan Kara
2021-10-08  1:50     ` yebin
2021-09-11  9:00 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/6] ext4: introduce last_check_time record previous check time Ye Bin
2021-10-07 12:31   ` Jan Kara
2021-10-08  1:56     ` yebin
2021-10-08  2:38       ` yebin
2021-10-12  8:47         ` Jan Kara
2021-10-12 11:46           ` yebin
2021-10-13  9:38             ` Jan Kara
2021-10-13 12:33               ` yebin
2021-10-13 21:41               ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-10-15  3:21                 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-10-15  3:21                 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-09-11  9:00 ` [PATCH -next v2 3/6] ext4: compare to local seq and nodename when check conflict Ye Bin
2021-10-07 12:36   ` Jan Kara
2021-09-11  9:00 ` [PATCH -next v2 4/6] ext4: avoid to re-read mmp check data get from page cache Ye Bin
2021-10-07 12:44   ` Jan Kara
2021-10-08  3:52     ` yebin [this message]
2021-09-11  9:00 ` [PATCH -next v2 5/6] ext4: avoid to double free s_mmp_bh Ye Bin
2021-09-11  9:00 ` [PATCH -next v2 6/6] ext4: fix possible store wrong check interval value in disk when umount Ye Bin
2021-10-07 13:12   ` Jan Kara
2021-10-08  3:49     ` yebin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=615FC08E.3060301@huawei.com \
    --to=yebin10@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).