public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yebin <yebin10@huawei.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	<linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ext4: Fix remount with 'abort' option isn't effective
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:41:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61C3D3CB.1010106@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211222091947.chmg6mcetocrmygd@work>



On 2021/12/22 17:19, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:06:22AM +0800, yebin wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/12/21 22:43, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> nice catch. This is a bug indeed. However I am currently in a process of
>>> changing the ctx_set/clear/test_ helpers because currently it generates
>>> functions that are unused.
>>>
>>> While I am at it I can just create a custom ctx_set_mount_flags()
>>> helper that would behave as expected so that we won't have to specify
>>> "1 < EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED" which is not really obvious and hence error
>>> prone.
>> Actually, I fixed the first version as follows:
> Allright, this looks better.
>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
>> index b72d989b77fb..199920ffc7d3 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
>> @@ -2049,8 +2049,8 @@ struct ext4_fs_context {
>>   	unsigned int	mask_s_mount_opt;
>>   	unsigned int	vals_s_mount_opt2;
>>   	unsigned int	mask_s_mount_opt2;
>> -	unsigned int	vals_s_mount_flags;
>> -	unsigned int	mask_s_mount_flags;
>> +	unsigned long	vals_s_mount_flags;
>> +	unsigned long	mask_s_mount_flags;
>>   	unsigned int	opt_flags;	/* MOPT flags */
>>   	unsigned int	spec;
>>   	u32		s_max_batch_time;
>> @@ -2166,7 +2166,12 @@ static inline bool ctx_test_##name(struct ext4_fs_context *ctx, int flag)\
>>   EXT4_SET_CTX(flags);
>>   EXT4_SET_CTX(mount_opt);
>>   EXT4_SET_CTX(mount_opt2);
>> -EXT4_SET_CTX(mount_flags);
>> +
>> +static inline void ctx_set_mount_flags(struct ext4_fs_context *ctx, int bit)
> Maybe ctx_set_mount_flag since you can't really set more than one this
> way?
So I think it's a little inappropriate to use the current repair scheme.
>> +{
>> +	set_bit(bit, &ctx->mask_s_mount_flags);
>> +	set_bit(bit, &ctx->vals_s_mount_flags);
>> +}
>>
>>
>> I think 'mask_s_mount_flags' is useless now.
> So how would we know what flags have changed ? Sure, there is currently
> no need to clear the flag but that can come in future and once it does
> we'll only need to create a clear helper, the rest will be ready.
> I'd rather keep it.
>
> -Lukas
 From this point of view, I agree with you.
>>> My plan is to send my patch set including this one tomorrow, will that
>>> be fine with you ?
>>>
>>> -Lukas
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 08:32:14PM +0800, Ye Bin wrote:
>>>> We test remount with 'abort' option as follows:
>>>> [root@localhost home]# mount  /dev/sda test
>>>> [root@localhost home]# mount | grep test
>>>> /dev/sda on /home/test type ext4 (rw,relatime)
>>>> [root@localhost home]# mount -o remount,abort test
>>>> [root@localhost home]# mount | grep test
>>>> /dev/sda on /home/test type ext4 (rw,relatime)
>>>>
>>>> Obviously, remount 'abort' option isn't effective.
>>>> After 6e47a3cc68fc commit we process abort option with 'ctx_set_mount_flags':
>>>> static inline void ctx_set_mount_flags(struct ext4_fs_context *ctx, int flag)
>>>> {
>>>> 	ctx->mask_s_mount_flags |= flag;
>>>> 	ctx->vals_s_mount_flags |= flag;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> But we test 'abort' option with 'ext4_test_mount_flag':
>>>> static inline int ext4_test_mount_flag(struct super_block *sb, int bit)
>>>> {
>>>>           return test_bit(bit, &EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_flags);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> To solve this issue, pass (1 <<  EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED) to 'ctx_set_mount_flags'.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes:6e47a3cc68fc("ext4: get rid of super block and sbi from handle_mount_ops()")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +-
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
>>>> index b72d989b77fb..071b7b3c5678 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
>>>> @@ -2236,7 +2236,7 @@ static int ext4_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
>>>>    			 param->key);
>>>>    		return 0;
>>>>    	case Opt_abort:
>>>> -		ctx_set_mount_flags(ctx, EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED);
>>>> +		ctx_set_mount_flags(ctx, 1 << EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED);
>>>>    		return 0;
>>>>    	case Opt_i_version:
>>>>    		ctx_set_flags(ctx, SB_I_VERSION);
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.31.1
>>>>
>>> .
>>>
> .
>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-23  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-21 12:32 [PATCH -next] ext4: Fix remount with 'abort' option isn't effective Ye Bin
2021-12-21 14:43 ` Lukas Czerner
2021-12-22  1:06   ` yebin
2021-12-22  9:19     ` Lukas Czerner
2021-12-23  1:41       ` yebin [this message]
2021-12-23 15:41         ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-02-01 13:13           ` [PATCH] ext4: fix remount with 'abort' option Lukas Czerner
2022-02-02 16:42             ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-02-02 19:00             ` Eric Sandeen
2022-03-02  9:43             ` Lukas Czerner
2022-03-03  0:40               ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-03-03  0:41             ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61C3D3CB.1010106@huawei.com \
    --to=yebin10@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox