From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <brauner@kernel.org>, <jack@suse.cz>,
<bcrl@kvack.org>, <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
<libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>, <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
<sforshee@kernel.org>, <pmladek@suse.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
<senozhatsky@chromium.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <horms@kernel.org>, <willemb@google.com>,
<jhs@mojatatu.com>, <jiri@resnulli.us>, <kees@kernel.org>,
<cyphar@cyphar.com>, <tglx@kernel.org>, <sdf@fomichev.me>,
<nb@tipi-net.de>, <liuhangbin@gmail.com>, <da-x@monatomic.org>,
<jeff@garzik.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-aio@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Convert barrier pairs to acquire/release for better performance
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 11:15:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64b8c520-808c-4d0f-aaa5-cb388f473ecf@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVpQUAR93t6CDrUzXt-v9qECSFHwYoofR4qinV5mty6LS7mJA@mail.gmail.com>
在 2026/9/1 11:06, Kuniyuki Iwashima 写道:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 7:42 PM Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series converts some existing smp_wmb()/smp_rmb() barrier pairs to
>> smp_store_release()/smp_load_acquire() across various subsystems.
>>
>> Background
>> ==========
>>
>> Many architectures support load acquire and store release instructions
>> which can replace explicit memory barriers and save cycles. As noted
>> in the ARM architecture reference [1]:
>>
>> "Weaker ordering requirements that are imposed by Load-Acquire and
>> Store-Release instructions allow for micro-architectural
>> optimizations, which could reduce some of the performance impacts
>> that are otherwise imposed by an explicit memory barrier.
>>
>> If the ordering requirement is satisfied using either a Load-Acquire
>> or Store-Release, then it would be preferable to use these
>> instructions instead of a DMB."
>>
>> On arm64, a typical seqcount [2] read loop requires 13 cycles with DMB
>> barriers. Replacing the read barrier with smp_load_acquire() reduces
>> this to 8 cycles on an Ampere Altra.
>>
>> We also observed significant barrier overhead while profiling Unxibench
>> syscall test on arm64: a single getuid() call is ~8ns slower than on
>> a comparable x86 system, with the dominant cost in map_id_up()'s smp_rmb(),
>> which is a DMB ISHLD on arm64. Converting it to smp_load_acquire() allows
>> the use of LDAR, eliminating the measurable overhead.
>>
>> This motivated a broader search for existing barrier pairs that can
>> be converted to the lighter acquire/release semantics.
>>
>> Changes
>> =======
>>
>> Each patch in this series targets a specific barrier pair where the
>> publish/subscribe pattern is already present:
>>
>> - Writers populate data, then publish a flag/count/pointer via
>> smp_store_release()
>>
>> - Readers load the flag/count/pointer via smp_load_acquire(), then
>> consume the data
>>
>> This preserves the existing memory ordering guarantees while allowing
>> architectures with native acquire/release instructions (e.g. arm64's
>> STLR/LDAR) to avoid the cost of full one-way barriers (DMB ISHST/ISHLD).
>> On architectures without native support, the generated code is
>> generally no worse than the explicit barrier pair.
>>
>> The conversions are mechanical and no functional change is intended.
>>
>> Testing (arm64 Kunpeng HIP09 server)
>> ================
>>
>> 1. UNIXBENCH syscall
>> Baseline: 715.27
>> Patched: 718.83
>> Improvement: +0.50%
>>
>> 2. fs/aio (fio + null_blk, 4 jobs):
>> Baseline: 1441k IOPS, 86.46us
>> Patched: 1452k IOPS, 85.80us
>> Improvement: ~0.8%
>>
>> 3. soreuseport (wrk, 8 servers):
>> Baseline: 162.6k req/s, 452.5us
>> Patched: 164.2k req/s, 449.4us
>> Improvement: ~1.0%
>>
>> Both improvements are consistent across runs and align with the
>> expected savings from replacing DMB with LDAR/STLR on arm64.
>>
>> [1]: https://support.arm.com/documentation/102336/0100/Load-Acquire-and-Store-Release-instructions
>> [2]: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d0dd066a0fa26d55c19ace9e89dedd9504c5bcba
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Fix pre-existing issue for ext4 and 8021q [3].
>> - Fix missing copy_mnt_idmap() udapte [3].
>> - Drop nacked isotp patch.
>> - Add test data.
>> - Add Reviewed-by and update fs patch as Jan suggested.
>>
>> [3]: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825095422.3166067-1-ruanjinjie%40huawei.com
>>
>> Jinjie Ruan (12):
>> user_namespace: Use acquire/release for nr_extents synchronization
>> lib/vsprintf: Use acquire/release for ptr_key publication
>> fs: aio: Use acquire/release for ring->tail publication
>> fs: Use acquire/release for fdtable resize synchronization
>> pidfs: Use test_bit_acquire() for attr flag tests
>> super: Use acquire for SB_BORN check in super_cache_count()
>> ext4: Fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_get_group_info()
>> ext4: Convert group-count barrier protocol to acquire/release
>> soreuseport: publish num_socks with acquire/release
>> net: sched: act_gact: use acquire/release for tcfg_ptype
>> 8021q: Fix data race when publishing vlan net_device pointers
>> 8021q: publish vlan_devices_arrays entries with acquire/release
>
> Please post networking patches separately with the target tree specified:
>
> Subject: [PATCH vX net-next] soreuseport: ...
>
> 8021q changes can be posted a series.
Thanks for the review. I will split the series as suggested — the
networking patches will be posted separately.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 2:42 [PATCH v2 00/12] Convert barrier pairs to acquire/release for better performance Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] user_namespace: Use acquire/release for nr_extents synchronization Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] lib/vsprintf: Use acquire/release for ptr_key publication Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] fs: aio: Use acquire/release for ring->tail publication Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] fs: Use acquire/release for fdtable resize synchronization Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] pidfs: Use test_bit_acquire() for attr flag tests Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] super: Use acquire for SB_BORN check in super_cache_count() Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] ext4: Fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_get_group_info() Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-01 6:44 ` Zhang Yi
2026-09-01 13:55 ` Jan Kara
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] ext4: Convert group-count barrier protocol to acquire/release Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] soreuseport: publish num_socks with acquire/release Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] net: sched: act_gact: use acquire/release for tcfg_ptype Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] 8021q: Fix data race when publishing vlan net_device pointers Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-01 14:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] 8021q: publish vlan_devices_arrays entries with acquire/release Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 3:06 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Convert barrier pairs to acquire/release for better performance Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-01 3:15 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64b8c520-808c-4d0f-aaa5-cb388f473ecf@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=da-x@monatomic.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sforshee@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox