linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yebin <yebin@huaweicloud.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: fix the inconsistency between checksum and data in memory for journal sb
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 09:47:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6904154D.2000903@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <zxnvimnlpbimcdcanpfqggs5inyqwfykiibcqg6at54bbqmpwa@xyyxops25565>



On 2025/10/30 18:46, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 28-10-25 14:47:28, Ye Bin wrote:
>> From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
>>
>> Copying the file system while it is mounted as read-only results in
>> a mount failure:
>> [~]# mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sdc
>> [~]# mount /dev/sdc -o ro /mnt/test
>> [~]# dd if=/dev/sdc of=/dev/sda bs=1M
>> [~]# mount /dev/sda /mnt/test1
>> [ 1094.849826] JBD2: journal checksum error
>> [ 1094.850927] EXT4-fs (sda): Could not load journal inode
>> mount: mount /dev/sda on /mnt/test1 failed: Bad message
>>
>> Above issue may happen as follows:
>> ext4_fill_super
>>   set_journal_csum_feature_set(sb)
>>    if (ext4_has_metadata_csum(sb))
>>     incompat = JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_CSUM_V3;
>>    if (test_opt(sb, JOURNAL_CHECKSUM)
>>     jbd2_journal_set_features(sbi->s_journal, compat, 0, incompat);
>>      lock_buffer(journal->j_sb_buffer);
>>      sb->s_feature_incompat  |= cpu_to_be32(incompat);
>>      //The data in the journal sb was modified, but the checksum was not
>>        updated, so the data remaining in memory has a mismatch between the
>>        data and the checksum.
>>      unlock_buffer(journal->j_sb_buffer);
>>
>> In this case, the journal sb copied over is in a state where the checksum
>> and data are inconsistent, so mounting fails.
>> To solve the above issue, update the checksum in memory after modifying
>> the journal sb.
>>
>> Fixes: 4fd5ea43bc11 ("jbd2: checksum journal superblock")
>> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
>
> Looks good but please add a short comment before the checksum update
> explaining why jbd2_superblock_csum() call in jbd2_write_superblock() isn't
> enough. Something like:
>
> 	/*
> 	 * Update the checksum now so that it is valid even for read-only
> 	 * filesystems where jbd2_write_superblock() doesn't get called.
> 	 */
>
Thank you for your suggestion. I will resend a new version.

> Otherwise feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>
> 								Honza
>
>> ---
>>   fs/jbd2/journal.c | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> index d480b94117cd..5b6e8c1a5e6a 100644
>> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> @@ -2349,6 +2349,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_set_features(journal_t *journal, unsigned long compat,
>>   	sb->s_feature_compat    |= cpu_to_be32(compat);
>>   	sb->s_feature_ro_compat |= cpu_to_be32(ro);
>>   	sb->s_feature_incompat  |= cpu_to_be32(incompat);
>> +	if (jbd2_journal_has_csum_v2or3(journal))
>> +		sb->s_checksum = jbd2_superblock_csum(sb);
>>   	unlock_buffer(journal->j_sb_buffer);
>>   	jbd2_journal_init_transaction_limits(journal);
>>
>> @@ -2378,9 +2380,13 @@ void jbd2_journal_clear_features(journal_t *journal, unsigned long compat,
>>
>>   	sb = journal->j_superblock;
>>
>> +	lock_buffer(journal->j_sb_buffer);
>>   	sb->s_feature_compat    &= ~cpu_to_be32(compat);
>>   	sb->s_feature_ro_compat &= ~cpu_to_be32(ro);
>>   	sb->s_feature_incompat  &= ~cpu_to_be32(incompat);
>> +	if (jbd2_journal_has_csum_v2or3(journal))
>> +		sb->s_checksum = jbd2_superblock_csum(sb);
>> +	unlock_buffer(journal->j_sb_buffer);
>>   	jbd2_journal_init_transaction_limits(journal);
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_clear_features);
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>


      reply	other threads:[~2025-10-31  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-28  6:47 [PATCH] jbd2: fix the inconsistency between checksum and data in memory for journal sb Ye Bin
2025-10-29  8:45 ` Zhang Yi
2025-10-29 11:44   ` yebin
2025-10-29 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30  2:13   ` Zhang Yi
2025-10-30 10:46 ` Jan Kara
2025-10-31  1:47   ` yebin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6904154D.2000903@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yebin@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).