From: "yebin (H)" <yebin10@huawei.com>
To: <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] jbd2: audit and convert legacy J_ASSERT usage
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 10:11:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69A6434F.9070205@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260303005502.337108-1-nikic.milos@gmail.com>
The macro `J_ASSERT_JH` is a rather troublesome implementation. There
are numerous calls to `J_ASSERT_JH` within
`jbd2_journal_commit_transaction()`, and after compilation, these may
all jump to the same address for execution, making it difficult to
determine exactly where the assertion is being triggered. If there is a
functional issue in just a single file system, using `BUG_ON` to handle
it seems a bit too aggressive.
I wonder if you all have any good ideas or suggestions.
On 2026/3/3 8:55, Milos Nikic wrote:
> Hello Jan and the ext4 team,
>
> This patch series follows up on the previous discussion regarding
> converting hard J_ASSERT panics into graceful journal aborts.
>
> In v1, we addressed a specific panic on unlock. Per Jan's suggestion,
> I have audited fs/jbd2/transaction.c for other low-hanging fruit
> where state machine invariants are enforced by J_ASSERT inside
> functions that natively support error returns.
>
> Changes in v3:
>
> Patch 2: Added pr_err() statements inside the ambiguous WARN_ON_ONCE()
> blocks (where multiple conditions are checked via logical OR/AND) to
> explicitly dump the b_transaction, b_next_transaction, and
> j_committing_transaction pointers. This provides necessary context for
> debugging state machine corruptions from the dmesg stack trace.
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> Patch 1: Unmodified from v1. Collected Reviewed-by tags.
>
> Patch 2: New patch resulting from the broader audit. Systematically
> replaces J_ASSERTs with WARN_ON_ONCE and graceful -EINVAL returns
> across 6 core transaction lifecycle functions. Careful attention was
> paid to ensuring spinlocks are safely dropped before triggering
> jbd2_journal_abort(), and no memory is leaked on the error paths.
>
> Milos Nikic (2):
> jbd2: gracefully abort instead of panicking on unlocked buffer
> jbd2: gracefully abort on transaction state corruptions
>
> fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-03 0:55 [PATCH v3 0/2] jbd2: audit and convert legacy J_ASSERT usage Milos Nikic
2026-03-03 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] jbd2: gracefully abort instead of panicking on unlocked buffer Milos Nikic
2026-03-03 1:05 ` Andreas Dilger
2026-03-03 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] jbd2: gracefully abort on transaction state corruptions Milos Nikic
2026-03-03 6:16 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-03 2:11 ` yebin (H) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69A6434F.9070205@huawei.com \
--to=yebin10@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox