linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <paul.chavent@fnac.net>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: What represent 646345728 bytes
Date: Mon,  1 Feb 2010 15:08:24 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7618835.18201265033304935.JavaMail.www@wsfrf1112> (raw)

Hi

I'am writing an application that write a stream of pictures of fixed size on a disk.

My app run on a self integrated gnu/linux (based on a 2.6.31.6-rt19 kernel).

My media is formated with

# mke2fs -t ext4 -L DATA -O large_file,^has_journal,extent -v /dev/sda3
[...]

And it is mounted with 

# mount -t ext4 /dev/sda3 /var/data/
EXT4-fs (sda3): no journal
EXT4-fs (sda3): delayed allocation enabled
EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
EXT4-fs (sda3): mounted filesystem without journal

My app opens the file with "O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_SYNC | O_DIRECT" flags.

Each write takes ~4.2ms for 304K (it is very good since it is the write bandwidth of my hard drive). There is a write every 100ms.

But every exactly 646345728 bytes, the write takes ~46ms.

I had the same problem with ext2 but every ~620M (the amount wasn't so constant).

Also i tryed to "posix_fallocate" with (eg 2G), and the first write overhead comes at this limit. I would like to avoid to preallocate.

I suppose it is a kind of block allocation issue. But i would like to have your opinion :
 - what is exatcly this amount of bytes ?
 - can i do something for having a "constant" write time from the user space point of view ?
 - is it a "probem" only for me ?

Thank you for your reading.

Paul.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2010-02-01 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-01 14:08 paul.chavent [this message]
2010-02-01 15:06 ` What represent 646345728 bytes Eric Sandeen
2010-02-01 17:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-02-01 17:34   ` Eric Sandeen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-01 17:06 paul.chavent
2010-02-01 20:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-01 22:36   ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-01 23:01     ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7618835.18201265033304935.JavaMail.www@wsfrf1112 \
    --to=paul.chavent@fnac.net \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).