From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ACAC43219 for ; Thu, 2 May 2019 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB2E2081C for ; Thu, 2 May 2019 17:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726297AbfEBRDs (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2019 13:03:48 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:41632 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726120AbfEBRDs (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2019 13:03:48 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: krisman) with ESMTPSA id 18F0227E9A0 From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Change feature name from fname_encoding to casefold? Organization: Collabora References: <20190413054317.7388-1-krisman@collabora.com> <20190413054317.7388-9-krisman@collabora.com> <20190502162527.GC25007@mit.edu> Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 13:03:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190502162527.GC25007@mit.edu> (Theodore Ts'o's message of "Thu, 2 May 2019 12:25:27 -0400") Message-ID: <85woj8kcup.fsf@collabora.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org "Theodore Ts'o" writes: > Given how we've simplified how we handle Unicode --- in particular, > not doing any kind of normalization unless we are doing case-folding > compares, I think it will be more user-friendly if we rename the > feature from fname_encoding to casefold. > > What do you think? Any objections? I don't object at all, but I'll need to update some test packages/documentation already published to customers in order to change it. So I'd need a final decision to be taken quickly on it. :) -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi