From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA6821D7989; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 22:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751497165; cv=none; b=o7/V9TKJPYD99m+ug4mWND8e1d1U+vH9n5fKzG5laKOJ1lNOzG2+p0ayC+eZhRMrsV/wHjfCQXQrZ6AI+b8+grcSQtT8tdczJHAWfEQpLfI3ZVd03pzMFnnzjGJoyKbOKtNL6qffVOyuunMUyFtR8N34NDw6DWGM44waaJrArhA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751497165; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h/5ux6cDiu4o+OyiOw2UsteSU+KlOgS9Vn5nFxjAIFU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PBKlbXXMAIt3+q9VzlX63oY5QebQFJOZv1nJs71vEQmfDDmCuN0o/n/YB15u1OiohH3oX0oKe645A0xHiYEFK/3jjEsRd8kTRqbzCCohFhYkC6PXdaqgqufL/SUZeXPQKjxKuKFo4inMNa93GHKQ+qoeChLCjkOmG4bkLtElxG8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=J3dHg68m; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="J3dHg68m" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net EDBF3406FC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1751497163; bh=h/5ux6cDiu4o+OyiOw2UsteSU+KlOgS9Vn5nFxjAIFU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=J3dHg68mGFe6mKKbDxYm6dJpD7/bRb7hZY0ok/6ZNb65BCTrcBiS0wLpQZjQXfT34 snN55Gb7Z7HK0oJU18glzjtlu97O183T/lgpCTvWXkGNy+Mu8kMnYYkJw/mTziYhGQ gv8vPlptg9aEohY9nmfpLT/zm3gMpITFOZoYARYa0TW6a9Qcxeqe1tywHMH4nqv8tH x4eTpgtNgYXbGoX2GsHWdqdcxVL9cOStc+MhqliIVa4w1IVhLhdGx05k8XB1vwfgvW VGnQkE9EFlqNLIFp0TdTDcuaicNDugZ/D+ZvMHJOHloRF76TlMLOjP+W6K7amnAEJY iUyBKgPENxrQQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDBF3406FC; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 22:59:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation , Linux ext4 Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" , "Darrick J. Wong" , Bagas Sanjaya Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ext4 docs toctree reorganization In-Reply-To: <20250620105643.25141-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com> References: <20250620105643.25141-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 16:59:22 -0600 Message-ID: <874ivunqr9.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Bagas Sanjaya writes: > Hi Jon, hi Ted, > > While discussing on my previous ext4 docs reorganization attempt > by merging contents [1], Jon suggested that considering current docs > file structure, a proper toctree would be ideal [2]. So, here's > the patchset that does exactly that. > > Actual conversion to toctree structure is in [1/5], while the rest > is cleanups to make the resulting toctree nicer. > > This patchset is based on docs-next tree. Applied, thanks. jon