From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
djwong@kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] common: Move exit related functions to a common/exit
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 09:53:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878qnfr67l.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250501091053.ghovsgjb52yvb7rj@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com>
Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 08:47:46AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Introduce a new file common/exit that will contain all the exit
>> > related functions. This will remove the dependencies these functions
>> > have on other non-related helper files and they can be indepedently
>> > sourced. This was suggested by Dave Chinner[1].
>> > While moving the exit related functions, remove _die() and die_now()
>> > and replace die_now with _fatal(). It is of no use to keep the
>> > unnecessary wrappers.
>> >
>> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/Z_UJ7XcpmtkPRhTr@dread.disaster.area/
>> > Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > check | 2 ++
>> > common/config | 17 -----------------
>> > common/exit | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > common/preamble | 3 +++
>> > common/punch | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> > common/rc | 28 ----------------------------
>> > 6 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>> > create mode 100644 common/exit
>> >
>> > diff --git a/check b/check
>> > index 9451c350..bd84f213 100755
>> > --- a/check
>> > +++ b/check
>> > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ export DIFF_LENGTH=${DIFF_LENGTH:=10}
>> >
>> > # by default don't output timestamps
>> > timestamp=${TIMESTAMP:=false}
>> > +. common/exit
>> > +. common/test_names
>>
>> So this gets sourced at the beginning of check script here.
>>
>> >
>> > rm -f $tmp.list $tmp.tmp $tmp.grep $here/$iam.out $tmp.report.* $tmp.arglist
>> >
>> <...>
>> > diff --git a/common/preamble b/common/preamble
>> > index ba029a34..51d03396 100644
>> > --- a/common/preamble
>> > +++ b/common/preamble
>> > @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ _register_cleanup()
>> > # explicitly as a member of the 'all' group.
>> > _begin_fstest()
>> > {
>> > + . common/exit
>> > + . common/test_names
>> > +
>>
>> Why do we need to source these files here again?
>> Isn't check script already sourcing both of this in the beginning
>> itself?
>
> The _begin_fstest is called at the beginning of each test case (e.g. generic/001).
> And "check" run each test cases likes:
>
> cmd="generic/001"
> ./$cmd
>
> So the imported things (by "check") can't help sub-case running
aah right. Each testcase is inoked by "exec ./$seq" and it won't have
the function definitions sourced from the previous shell process. So we
will need to source the necessary files again within the test execution.
-ritesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 12:45 [PATCH v3 0/2] common: Move exit related functions to common/exit Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-30 12:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] common: Move exit related functions to a common/exit Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-05-01 3:17 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-01 9:10 ` Zorro Lang
2025-05-02 4:23 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2025-05-03 3:06 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-04-30 12:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] check: Replace exit with _fatal and _exit in check Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-05-01 3:31 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-02 6:10 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-05-06 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] common: Move exit related functions to common/exit Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-05-06 15:03 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878qnfr67l.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox