From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: jing zhang <zj.barak@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove unnecessary operation in ext4_mb_normalize_group_request()
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:57:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bpebnonl.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac8f92701003260644s7dad8b4mea3bcb4dbcedfd17@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:44:33 +0800, jing zhang <zj.barak@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/3/26, Aneesh Kumar K. V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:54:21 +0800, jing zhang <zj.barak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> From: Jing Zhang <zj.barak@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Date: Wed Mar 25 22:55:04 2010
> >>
> >> Checking bug seems not at right place, and the function itself should
> >> be inlined.
> >>
> >> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> >> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
> >> Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <zj.barak@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> --- linux-2.6.32/fs/ext4/mballoc.c 2009-12-03 11:51:22.000000000 +0800
> >> +++ ext4_mm_leak/mballoc-10.c 2010-03-25 22:44:00.000000000 +0800
> >> @@ -2786,9 +2786,7 @@ out_err:
> >> static void ext4_mb_normalize_group_request(struct
> >> ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> >> {
> >> struct super_block *sb = ac->ac_sb;
> >> - struct ext4_locality_group *lg = ac->ac_lg;
> >>
> >> - BUG_ON(lg == NULL);
> >> if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_stripe)
> >> ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_stripe;
> >> else
> >
> > That BUG_ON is to ensure that the allocation context is actually having
> > a locality group which is needed for group allocation request.
> >
> > -aneesh
> >
>
> Please check
> 1, the 3 lines at the end of ext4_mb_group_or_file()
> 2, the function name of this patch
>
What i wanted to mention was the BUG_ON is there to ensure that we don't
call ext4_mb_normalize_group_request on non group enabled allocation
context by programming mistake. Doing that would cause ac_g_ex.fe_len
to change. So that BUG_ON is there to capture a programming error.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-26 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-25 14:54 [PATCH] ext4: remove unnecessary operation in ext4_mb_normalize_group_request() jing zhang
2010-03-26 8:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-03-26 13:44 ` jing zhang
2010-03-26 14:27 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V [this message]
2010-03-26 14:37 ` jing zhang
2010-04-05 12:48 ` tytso
2010-04-06 14:05 ` jing zhang
2010-04-06 17:01 ` tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bpebnonl.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zj.barak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).