From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ext4 64bit (disk >16TB) question
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:50:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bq10w8gv.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
Hi,
we are using lustre on a cluster of servers and raid boxes. Currently
lustre is based on the ext3 code and has a limit of 8TiB for each
filesystem. For us that results on having to split a servers storage
into up to 4 chunks and run one fs on each which I would rather avoid.
The solution for this would be to rebase the lustre patches to use
ext4 instead, which should also reduce the patch set considerably.
Lustre already patches a lot of ext4 features into the ext3 base.
But before I start rebasing lustre I though I would first test out
plain ext4 so I know any bugs I find will be from my rebasing and not
already existing in ext4 itself. And there I run into a big problem:
Current e2fsprogs (1.41) seem to be totaly unable to handle the ext4 64BIT
feature, i.e. filesystems larger than 16TiB. The mkfs.ext4 always
stops saying the disk exceeds the 32bit block count. And looking at
the code I see a lot of blk_t (instead of blk64_t) and unsigned long
(instead of unsigned long long [or even better blk64_t]) usage.
I found ext4 64bit patches for e2fsprogs 1.39 that fix at least
mkfs. Does anyone know if there is an updated patch set for 1.41
anywhere? And when will that be added to e2fsprogs upstream?
MfG
Goswin
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-14 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-14 19:50 Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2008-07-14 23:46 ` ext4 64bit (disk >16TB) question Theodore Tso
2008-07-15 5:42 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2008-07-15 12:36 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-15 17:00 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2008-07-15 17:19 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-15 13:16 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-07-15 14:01 ` Bernd Schubert
2008-07-15 14:08 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-07-15 16:13 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2008-07-15 18:27 ` Jose R. Santos
2008-07-15 20:12 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-15 20:15 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-07-15 21:03 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2008-07-15 21:20 ` Jose R. Santos
2008-07-16 10:10 ` Goswin von Brederlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bq10w8gv.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
--to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox