* [PATCH] ext4: fix double unlock buffer mess during fs-resize
@ 2012-09-07 10:14 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-25 15:25 ` [PATCH] PING " Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-26 3:26 ` [PATCH] " Theodore Ts'o
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Monakhov @ 2012-09-07 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4; +Cc: tytso, djwong, Dmitry Monakhov
bh_submit_read() is responsible for unlock bh on endio
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
---
fs/ext4/resize.c | 15 +++++----------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index 41f6ef6..3b05198 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -1076,17 +1076,12 @@ static struct buffer_head *ext4_get_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, __u64 block)
struct buffer_head *bh = sb_getblk(sb, block);
if (!bh)
return NULL;
-
- if (bitmap_uptodate(bh))
- return bh;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PING ext4: fix double unlock buffer mess during fs-resize
2012-09-07 10:14 [PATCH] ext4: fix double unlock buffer mess during fs-resize Dmitry Monakhov
@ 2012-09-25 15:25 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-26 3:26 ` [PATCH] " Theodore Ts'o
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Monakhov @ 2012-09-25 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4; +Cc: tytso, djwong
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:14:44 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> wrote:
> bh_submit_read() is responsible for unlock bh on endio
>
Hi, are any objections against this fix?
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
> ---
> fs/ext4/resize.c | 15 +++++----------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
> index 41f6ef6..3b05198 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
> @@ -1076,17 +1076,12 @@ static struct buffer_head *ext4_get_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, __u64 block)
> struct buffer_head *bh = sb_getblk(sb, block);
> if (!bh)
> return NULL;
> -
> - if (bitmap_uptodate(bh))
> - return bh;
> -
> - lock_buffer(bh);
> - if (bh_submit_read(bh) < 0) {
> - unlock_buffer(bh);
> - brelse(bh);
> - return NULL;
> + if (!bh_uptodate_or_lock(bh)) {
> + if (bh_submit_read(bh) < 0) {
> + brelse(bh);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> }
> - unlock_buffer(bh);
>
> return bh;
> }
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix double unlock buffer mess during fs-resize
2012-09-07 10:14 [PATCH] ext4: fix double unlock buffer mess during fs-resize Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-25 15:25 ` [PATCH] PING " Dmitry Monakhov
@ 2012-09-26 3:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2012-09-26 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Monakhov; +Cc: linux-ext4, djwong
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:14:44PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> bh_submit_read() is responsible for unlock bh on endio
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Thanks, applied.
BTW, I was checking the call sites for ext4_get_bitmap() in
fs/ext/resize.c, and we doing some extra work in
ext4_set_bitmap_checksums(); if the bitmap is uninitialized, then
there's no point in generating a checksum for it.
Something we can fix later, since it's harmless, although it is extra
unnecessary work.
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-26 3:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-07 10:14 [PATCH] ext4: fix double unlock buffer mess during fs-resize Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-25 15:25 ` [PATCH] PING " Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-26 3:26 ` [PATCH] " Theodore Ts'o
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).