From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] Defragmentation strategies
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:59:14 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k3a9d8jh.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
Hi.
In ext4 we have EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT ioctl which allow to
migrate data block. At this moment the only defragmentation
strategy we have in e4defrag(8) is defragmentation of big files.
But one can imagine different defragmentation strategies for
different file sizes and different purposes. I would like to start a
discussion about list of strategies which can be usable for us:
* Big file defragmentation
Good known strategy to make big files
** Example: In fact fragmented for big files may appear only in such cases
1) Creation big files on FS which has low free space
2) weird io pattern (multi-threaded small chunks random io + fsync) or
punch_hole/collapse_range etc.
* Compact small old files to continuous chunks.
** Example:
news, mail, web or cache server contains a lot of small files in
each directory. And files are periodically created and unlinked
after some period of time. Files has different(unpredictable)
life-time which result in fragmented fs because block allocator tries
to compact new files to each other, but later unlink result in
fragmentation. In case of thin-provision target this also result
in significant waste of space.
** Proposed strategy:
Scan directory and collect small old files it to continuous chunks.
Core idea is similar to block allocations smaller than
s_mb_stream_request. But at this moment we have more information about
file history because if mtime is close to ctime then append is
unlikely to happen in future so compaction is effective.
* Compact files according to IO access pattern.
Various tracers may collect statistics about IO access pattern, so
we can place such block close to each other and reduce number of seeks.
** Example:
1) Boot io pattern are almost identical across boots
2) Firefox start-up speedup http://glandium.org/blog/?p=1296
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-28 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-28 10:59 Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2014-04-29 11:23 ` [RFC] Defragmentation strategies Lukáš Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k3a9d8jh.fsf@openvz.org \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).