From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Prevent race while waling extent tree
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:01:17 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87liecs3qq.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352372929-18513-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com>
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 12:08:49 +0100, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> wrote:
> Currently ext4_ext_walk_space() only takes i_data_sem for read when
> searching for the extent at given block with ext4_ext_find_extent().
> Then it drops the lock and the extent tree can be changed at will.
> However later on we're searching for the 'next' extent, but the extent
> tree might already have changed, so the information might not be
> accurate.
>
> In fact we can hit BUG_ON(end <= start) if the extent got inserted into
> the tree after the one we found and before the block we were searching
> for. This has been reproduced by running xfstests 225 in loop on s390x
> architecture, but theoretically we could hit this on any other
> architecture as well, but probably not as often.
>
> ext4_ext_walk_space() is currently only used from ext4_fiemap() and even
> if we do not hit the BUG_ON() fiemap might return scrambled information
> to the user.
>
> Fix this by requiring ext4_ext_walk_space() to be called with i_data_sem
> held. By calling it from ext4_fiemap() we can only take the i_data_sem
> for read, but possibly other users might want to modify the extents so
> they will be able to take write lock.
Agree as a short term fix for BUGON case, but Theodore suggested to use
seqlock approach http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2011/10/26/25
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 7011ac9..f1aca06 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -1959,6 +1959,11 @@ cleanup:
> return err;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * ext4_ext_walk_space() should be called with i_data_sem locked. If we're
> + * not modifying found extents, or extent tree in callback function, then
> + * read lock is ok.
> + */
> static int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
> ext4_lblk_t num, ext_prepare_callback func,
> void *cbdata)
> @@ -1976,9 +1981,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
> while (block < last && block != EXT_MAX_BLOCKS) {
> num = last - block;
> /* find extent for this block */
> - down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> path = ext4_ext_find_extent(inode, block, path);
> - up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> if (IS_ERR(path)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(path);
> path = NULL;
> @@ -5021,8 +5024,10 @@ int ext4_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
> * Walk the extent tree gathering extent information.
> * ext4_ext_fiemap_cb will push extents back to user.
> */
> + down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> error = ext4_ext_walk_space(inode, start_blk, len_blks,
> ext4_ext_fiemap_cb, fieinfo);
> + up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> }
>
> return error;
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-08 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-08 11:08 [PATCH] ext4: Prevent race while waling extent tree Lukas Czerner
2012-11-08 12:01 ` Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2012-11-08 13:43 ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-11-08 16:07 ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-11-08 21:52 ` Zach Brown
2012-11-09 9:19 ` Lukáš Czerner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-12 14:57 Lukas Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87liecs3qq.fsf@openvz.org \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).