linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ext4: Add statx support for atomic writes
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:15:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o738m5yk.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241025160942.GJ2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs>

"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 03:38:03PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On 25/10/2024 04:45, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>> >> This patch adds base support for atomic writes via statx getattr.
>> >> On bs < ps systems, we can create FS with say bs of 16k. That means
>> >> both atomic write min and max unit can be set to 16k for supporting
>> >> atomic writes.
>> >> 
>> >> Later patches adds support for bigalloc as well so that ext4 can also
>> >> support doing atomic writes for bs = ps systems.
>> >> 
>> >> Co-developed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>   fs/ext4/ext4.h  |  7 ++++++-
>> >>   fs/ext4/inode.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> >>   fs/ext4/super.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>   3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >> 
>> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> >> index 44b0d418143c..a41e56c2c628 100644
>> >> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> >> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> >> @@ -1729,6 +1729,10 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
>> >>   	 */
>> >>   	struct work_struct s_sb_upd_work;
>> >>   
>> >> +	/* Atomic write unit values */
>> >> +	unsigned int fs_awu_min;
>> >> +	unsigned int fs_awu_max;
>> >> +
>> >>   	/* Ext4 fast commit sub transaction ID */
>> >>   	atomic_t s_fc_subtid;
>> >>   
>> >> @@ -1820,7 +1824,8 @@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>> >>    */
>> >>   enum {
>> >>   	EXT4_MF_MNTDIR_SAMPLED,
>> >> -	EXT4_MF_FC_INELIGIBLE	/* Fast commit ineligible */
>> >> +	EXT4_MF_FC_INELIGIBLE,	/* Fast commit ineligible */
>> >> +	EXT4_MF_ATOMIC_WRITE	/* Supports atomic write */
>> >
>> > Does this flag really buy us much?
>> >
>> 
>> I felt it is cleaner this way than comparing non-zero values of
>> fs_awu_min and fs_awu_max.
>
> What does it mean when MF_ATOMIC_WRITE is set and fs_awu_* are zero?
> The awu values don't change at runtime, so I think you can save yourself
> an atomic test by checking (non-atomically) for awu_min>0.

Sure. I agree with the reasoning that we can just check for awu_min > 0.
I can write an inline helper for this.

>
> (I don't know anything about the flags, those came after my time iirc.)
>

Thanks for the review :) 

-ritesh

> --D
>
>> Now that you pointed at it - Maybe a question for others who might have
>> the history of which one to use when - or do we think there is a scope
>> of merging the two into just one as a later cleanup?
>> 
>> I know that s_mount_flags was added for fastcommit and it needed the
>> state manipulations to be done in atomic way. Similarly s_ext4_flags
>> also was renamed from s_resize_flags for more general purpose use. Both
>> of these looks like could be merged isn't it?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >>   };
>> >>   
>> >>   static inline void ext4_set_mount_flag(struct super_block *sb, int bit)
>> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> >> index 54bdd4884fe6..897c028d5bc9 100644
>> >> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> >> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> >> @@ -5578,6 +5578,20 @@ int ext4_getattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, const struct path *path,
>> >>   		}
>> >>   	}
>> >>   
>> >> +	if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && (request_mask & STATX_WRITE_ATOMIC)) {
>> >> +		struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
>> >> +		unsigned int awu_min, awu_max;
>> >> +
>> >> +		if (ext4_test_mount_flag(inode->i_sb, EXT4_MF_ATOMIC_WRITE)) {
>> >
>> > I'd use ext4_inode_can_atomicwrite() here, similar to what is done for xfs
>> >
>> 
>> Sure since it is inode operation, we can check against ext4_inode_can_atomicwrite().
>> 
>> 
>> >> +			awu_min = sbi->fs_awu_min;
>> >> +			awu_max = sbi->fs_awu_max;
>> >> +		} else {
>> >> +			awu_min = awu_max = 0;
>> >> +		}
>> >> +
>> >> +		generic_fill_statx_atomic_writes(stat, awu_min, awu_max);
>> >> +	}
>> >> +
>> >>   	flags = ei->i_flags & EXT4_FL_USER_VISIBLE;
>> >>   	if (flags & EXT4_APPEND_FL)
>> >>   		stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_APPEND;
>> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
>> >> index 16a4ce704460..f5c075aff060 100644
>> >> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
>> >> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
>> >> @@ -4425,6 +4425,37 @@ static int ext4_handle_clustersize(struct super_block *sb)
>> >>   	return 0;
>> >>   }
>> >>   
>> >> +/*
>> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-25 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-25  3:45 [PATCH 0/6] ext4: Add atomic write support for DIO Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25  3:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] ext4: Add statx support for atomic writes Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25  9:41   ` John Garry
2024-10-25 10:08     ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 16:09       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 17:45         ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2024-10-25  3:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] ext4: Check for atomic writes support in write iter Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25  9:44   ` John Garry
2024-10-25 10:33     ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 16:11       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 17:50         ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25  3:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25  3:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] ext4: Warn if we ever fallback to buffered-io for DIO atomic writes Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25 16:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 17:51     ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-27 22:26   ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-28  1:09     ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-28  5:26       ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-28  8:43         ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-28 18:14         ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-29 22:29           ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-29 23:51             ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25  3:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on " Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25  8:52   ` John Garry
2024-10-25  9:31     ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25  9:59       ` John Garry
2024-10-25 10:35         ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 11:07           ` John Garry
2024-10-25 11:19             ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 12:23               ` John Garry
2024-10-25 12:36                 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 14:04                   ` John Garry
2024-10-25 14:13                     ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 18:28                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-26  4:35                         ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-31 21:36                           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-04  1:52                             ` Dave Chinner
2024-11-05  0:09                               ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25  3:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] ext4: Add atomic write support for bigalloc Ritesh Harjani (IBM)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o738m5yk.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).