Re: [ANNOUNCE] work tree for untorn filesystem writes

[Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>]

"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> writes:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Nobody else has stepped up to do this, so I've created a work branch for
> the fs side of untorn writes:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux.git/log/?h=fs-atomic_2024-11-04
>
> Can you all check this to make sure that I merged it correctly?

Sorry, I couldn't reply earlier(I am currently on travel). Yes, the ext4
merge looks correct to me. You have taken the latest v4 of the ext4
atomic write series [1]. 

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/cover.1730437365.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/

> And maybe go test this on your storage hardware? :)

Due to limited connectivity during my travel, I don't have the access to
the hardware. But as I mentioned the merge looks correct to me and I had
tested those patches earlier on Power and x86.
But I will in general re-test the mentioned fs branch for both XFS and
ext4 once I reach back but I don't think we need to wait for that as the
merge looks good to me.

Also, I noticed that we might have missed to add a Tested-by from
Ojaswin for XFS series here [2]. Although Ojaswin mentioned that he
might also re-test the mentioned FS atomic write branch for both XFS and
EXT4.

[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/Zxnp8bma2KrMDg5m@li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com/


-ritesh

> If all goes well then I think the next step is to ask brauner very
> nicely if he'd consider adding this to the vfs trees for 6.13.  If not
> then I guess we can submit it ourselves, though we probably ought to ask
> rothwell to add the branch to for-next asap.
>
> PS: We're now past -rc6 so please reply quickly so that this doesn't
> slip yet another cycle.
>
> Catherine: John's on vacation all week, could you please send me the
> latest versions of the xfs_io pwrite-atomic patch and the fstest for it?
>
> --D