linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luís Henriques" <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix memory leaks in ext4_fname_{setup_filename,prepare_lookup}
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 09:58:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sf90v6xk.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230803041918.GA1218@sol.localdomain> (Eric Biggers's message of "Wed, 2 Aug 2023 21:19:18 -0700")

Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Luís Henriques wrote:
>> If casefolding the filename fails, we'll be leaking fscrypt_buf name.
>
> fscrypt_buf => fscrypt_name
>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/crypto.c b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
>> index e20ac0654b3f..3c05c7f3415b 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/crypto.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
>> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ int ext4_fname_setup_filename(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *iname,
>>	struct fscrypt_name name;
>>	int err;
>>
>>	err = fscrypt_setup_filename(dir, iname, lookup, &name);
>>	if (err)
>>		return err;
>>
>>	ext4_fname_from_fscrypt_name(fname, &name);
>>
>>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>>  	err = ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename(dir, iname, fname);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		fscrypt_free_filename(&name);
>>  #endif
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>> @@ -51,6 +53,8 @@ int ext4_fname_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>>	struct fscrypt_name name;
>>	int err;
>>
>>	err = fscrypt_prepare_lookup(dir, dentry, &name);
>>	if (err)
>>		return err;
>>
>>	ext4_fname_from_fscrypt_name(fname, &name);
>>
>>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>>  	err = ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename(dir, &dentry->d_name, fname);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		fscrypt_free_filename(&name);
>>  #endif
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>
> This works, but it's a bit weird that the freeing happens on the original struct
> fscrypt_name after it has already been "moved" to the struct ext4_filename by
> ext4_fname_from_fscrypt_name().  That leaves a dangling pointer in the struct
> ext4_filename.  Maybe you should call ext4_fname_free_filename() instead, even
> though it would do some unnecessary work?

That makes sense, specially because fname is a parameter and it's probably
a good idea to clean-up everything before returning an error.  Thanks.

Cheers,
-- 
Luís

      reply	other threads:[~2023-08-03  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-02  9:49 [PATCH v2] ext4: fix memory leaks in ext4_fname_{setup_filename,prepare_lookup} Luís Henriques
2023-08-03  4:19 ` Eric Biggers
2023-08-03  8:58   ` Luís Henriques [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sf90v6xk.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=lhenriques@suse.de \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).