linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Cc: ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/12] ext4: extend ext4_mb_mark_context to support allocation under journal
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 14:43:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttrgf07f.fsf@doe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919201532.310085-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> writes:

> Previously, ext4_mb_mark_context is only called under fast commit
> replay path, so there is no valid handle when we update block bitmap
> and group descriptor. This patch try to extend ext4_mb_mark_context
> to be used by code under journal. There are several improvement:
> 1. add "handle_t *handle" to struct ext4_mark_context to journal block
> bitmap and group descriptor update inside ext4_mb_mark_context (the
> added journal code is based on ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used where
> ext4_mb_mark_context is going to be used.)

> 2. add EXT4_MB_BITMAP_MARKED_CHECK flag to control check if bits in block
> bitmap are already marked as allocation code under journal asserts that
> all bits to be changed are not marked before.

Maybe we can reword this to... 
Adds a flag argument to ext4_mb_mark_context() which controls
a. EXT4_MB_BITMAP_MARKED_CHECK - whether block bitmap checking is needed.
b. EXT4_MB_SYNC_UPDATE - whether dirty buffers (bitmap and group descriptor) needs sync.


> 3. add "ext4_grpblk_t changed" to struct ext4_mark_context to notify number
> of bits in block bitmap has changed.

We should remove above point 3 as there is no "struct ext4_mark_context"
in this v7 series.

>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)


The changes looks good to me. With commit msg updated, feel free to add-

Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-27  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-19 20:15 [PATCH v7 00/12] cleanups and unit test for mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] ext4: make state in ext4_mb_mark_bb to be bool Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  6:10   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-27  6:51     ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] ext4: factor out codes to update block bitmap and group descriptor on disk from ext4_mb_mark_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  8:49   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-28  3:31     ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-28  4:42       ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-28  7:45         ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_free_blocks_simple Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  8:52   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] ext4: extend ext4_mb_mark_context to support allocation under journal Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  9:13   ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  9:58   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] ext4: Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in ext4_mb_clear_bb() Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:06   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_mb_clear_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:14   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] ext4: Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in ext4_group_add_blocks() Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:16   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context " Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:19   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] ext4: add some kunit stub for mballoc kunit test Kemeng Shi
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] ext4: add first unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple in mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:39   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] ext4: run mballoc test with different layouts setting Kemeng Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ttrgf07f.fsf@doe.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).