linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, lczerner@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] ext4: completed_io locking cleanup V4
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:21:25 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txubsswa.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121002133019.GC22777@quack.suse.cz>

On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 15:30:19 +0200, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Tue 02-10-12 16:42:39, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:11:06 +0200, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > > On Tue 02-10-12 14:57:22, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:31:41 +0200, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue 02-10-12 11:16:38, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > > > > > > > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> > > > > > > > +	while (!list_empty(&complete)) {
> > > > > > > > +		io = list_entry(complete.next, ext4_io_end_t, list);
> > > > > > > > +		io->flag &= ~EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> > > > > > > > +		/* end_io context can not be destroyed now because it still
> > > > > > > > +		 * used by queued worker. Worker thread will destroy it later */
> > > > > > > > +		if (io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_QUEUED)
> > > > > > > > +			list_del_init(&io->list);
> > > > > > > > +		else
> > > > > > > > +			list_move(&io->list, &to_free);
> > > > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > > > +	/* If we are called from worker context, it is time to clear queued
> > > > > > > > +	 * flag, and destroy it's end_io if it was converted already */
> > > > > > > > +	if (work_io) {
> > > > > > > > +		work_io->flag &= ~EXT4_IO_END_QUEUED;
> > > > > > > > +		if (!(work_io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN))
> > > > > > > > +			list_add_tail(&work_io->list, &to_free);
> > > > > > > >  	}
> > > > > > > > -	list_del_init(&io->list);
> > > > > > > >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> > > > > > > > -	(void) ext4_end_io_nolock(io);
> > > > > > > > -	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> > > > > > > > -free:
> > > > > > > > -	ext4_free_io_end(io);
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > +	while (!list_empty(&to_free)) {
> > > > > > > > +		io = list_entry(to_free.next, ext4_io_end_t, list);
> > > > > > > > +		list_del_init(&io->list);
> > > > > > > > +		ext4_free_io_end(io);
> > > > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > > > +	return ret;
> > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > > > + * work on completed aio dio IO, to convert unwritten extents to extents
> > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > +static void ext4_end_io_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > +	ext4_io_end_t *io = container_of(work, ext4_io_end_t, work);
> > > > > > > > +	ext4_do_flush_completed_IO(io->inode, io);
> > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > +int ext4_flush_completed_IO(struct inode *inode)
> > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > +	return ext4_do_flush_completed_IO(inode, NULL);
> > > > > > > >  }
> > > > > > >   Also it seems that when ext4_flush_completed_IO() is called, workqueue
> > > > > > > can have several IO structures queued in its local lists thus we miss them
> > > > > > > here and don't properly wait for all conversions?
> > > > > > No it is not. Because list drained atomically, and 
> > > > > > add_complete_io will queue work only if list is empty.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Race between conversion and dequeue-process is not possible because
> > > > > > we hold lock during entire walk of complete_list, so from external
> > > > > > point of view we mark list as conversed(clear unwritten flag)
> > > > > > happens atomically. I've drawn all possible situations and race not
> > > > > > happen. If you know any please let me know.
> > > > >   I guess I'm missing something obvious. So let's go step by step:
> > > > > 1) ext4_flush_completed_IO() must make sure there is no outstanding
> > > > >    conversion for the inode.
> > > > > 2) Now assume we have non-empty i_completed_io_list - thus work is queued.
> > > > > 3) The following situation seems to be possible:
> > > > > 
> > > > > CPU1					CPU2
> > > > > (worker thread)				(truncate)
> > > > > ext4_end_io_work()
> > > > >   ext4_do_flush_completed_IO()
> > > > >     spin_lock_irqsave(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> > > > >     dump_completed_IO(inode);
> > > > >     list_replace_init(&ei->i_completed_io_list, &unwritten);
> > > > >     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> > > > > 
> > > > > 					ext4_flush_completed_IO()
> > > > > 					  ext4_do_flush_completed_IO()
> > > > > 					    - sees empty i_completed_io_list
> > > > > 					     => exits
> > > > > 
> > > > >   But we still have some conversions pending in 'unwritten' list. What am
> > > > > I missing?
> > > > Indeed, I've simply missed that case. The case which result silently
> > > > broke integrity sync ;(
> > > > Thank you for spotting this. I'll be back with updated version.
> > >   Umm, actually, I was thinking about it and ext4_flush_completed_IO()
> > > seems to be unnecessary in fsync these days. We don't call aio_complete()
> > > until we perform the conversion so what fsync does to such IO is undefined.
> > > Such optimization is a separate matter though.
> > Yes aio is ok, but integrity fsync after buffered write to unwritten
> > extent is broken.
> > 
> > fsync()                             blkdev_completion          kwork
> > ->filemap_write_and_wait_range
> >                                     ->ext4_end_bio
> >                                      ->end_page_writeback
> >  <-- filemap_write_and_wait_range return  
> >                                       ->ext4_add_complete_io
> > 
> >                                                               ->ext4_do_flush_completed_IO
> >                                                                  ->list_replace_init
> > ->ext4_flush_completed_IO
> >   sees empty i_comleted_io_list but pended
> >   conversion still exist
> >                                                                 ->ext4_end_io
> > 
>   Correct. Thanks for pointing that out.
In my deference I should say that integrity fsync was broken before my patch in
case of buffered writes because end_page_writeback called before
end_io added to ei->i_comlete_io_list
 fsync()                                    blkdev_completion
 ->filemap_write_and_wait_range
                                            ->ext4_end_bio
                                             ->end_page_writeback
  <-- filemap_write_and_wait_range return  
 ->ext4_flush_completed_IO
   sees empty i_comleted_io_list but pended
   conversion still exist
                                               ->ext4_add_complete_io


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-03 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-28 15:44 [PATCH 00/11] ext4: Bunch of DIO/AIO fixes V4 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 01/11] ext4: ext4_inode_info diet Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-01 16:28   ` Jan Kara
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 02/11] ext4: give i_aiodio_unwritten more appropriate name Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: fix unwritten counter leakage Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-01 16:37   ` Jan Kara
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 04/11] ext4: completed_io locking cleanup V4 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-01 18:38   ` Jan Kara
2012-10-02  7:16     ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-02 10:31       ` Jan Kara
2012-10-02 10:57         ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-02 11:11           ` Jan Kara
2012-10-02 12:42             ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-02 13:30               ` Jan Kara
2012-10-03 11:21                 ` Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2012-10-04 10:22                   ` Jan Kara
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 05/11] ext4: remove ext4_end_io() Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-04 22:57   ` Anatol Pomozov
2012-10-05  4:28     ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 06/11] ext4: serialize dio nonlocked reads with defrag workers V3 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-01 16:39   ` Jan Kara
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] ext4: serialize unlocked dio reads with truncate Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-29  4:49   ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-29 11:43     ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 08/11] ext4: endless truncate due to nonlocked dio readers V2 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-01 16:41   ` Jan Kara
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 09/11] ext4: serialize truncate with owerwrite DIO workers V2 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 10/11] ext4: punch_hole should wait for DIO writers V2 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-10-01 16:46   ` Jan Kara
2012-09-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 11/11] ext4: fix ext_remove_space for punch_hole case Dmitry Monakhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87txubsswa.fsf@openvz.org \
    --to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).