public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] ext2: Convert ext2 regular file buffered I/O to use iomap
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:57:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmtzhku7.fsf@doe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWgPzfd8P+F/qQlh@infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:54:31AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> So I took a look at this. Here is what I think -
>> So this is useful of-course when we have a large folio. Because
>> otherwise it's just one block at a time for each folio. This is not a
>> problem once FS buffered-io handling code moves to iomap (because we
>> can then enable large folio support to it).
>
> Yes.
>
>> However, this would still require us to pass a folio to ->map_blocks
>> call to determine the size of the folio (which I am not saying can't be
>> done but just stating my observations here).
>
> XFS currently maps based on the underlyig reservation (delalloc extent)
> and not the actual map size.   This works because on-disk extents are
> allocated as unwritten extents, and only the actual written part is
> the converted.  But if you only want to allocate blocks for the part
> actually written you actually need to pass in the dirty range and not
> just use the whole folio.  This would be the incremental patch to do
> that:

yes. dirty range indeed.

>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/xfs.git/commitdiff/0007893015796ef2ba16bb8b98c4c9fb6e9e6752
>
> But unless your block allocator is very cheap doing what XFS does is
> probably going to work much better.
>
>> ...ok so here is the PoC for seq counter check for ext2. Next let me
>> try to see if we can lift this up from the FS side to iomap - 
>
> This looks good to me from a very superficial view.  Dave is the expert
> on this, though.

Sure.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-30  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1700506526.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
2023-11-20 19:05 ` [RFC 1/3] ext2: Fix ki_pos update for DIO buffered-io fallback case Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-11-21  4:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-21  5:36     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-22  6:51       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-20 19:05 ` [RFC 2/3] ext2: Convert ext2 regular file buffered I/O to use iomap Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-11-20 20:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-21  4:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-21  5:56     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-21  6:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-21  6:15         ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-22 12:29   ` Jan Kara
2023-11-22 13:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-22 20:26       ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30  3:24         ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30  4:22           ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-30  4:37             ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30  4:30           ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-30  5:27             ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2023-11-30  8:22             ` Zhang Yi
2023-11-30  7:45           ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30 10:18             ` Jan Kara
2023-11-30 10:59               ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30 14:08                 ` Jan Kara
2023-11-30 15:50                   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30 16:01                     ` Jan Kara
2023-11-30 16:03                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-01 23:09           ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-05 15:22             ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-12-07  8:58               ` Jan Kara
2023-11-22 22:26       ` Dave Chinner
2023-11-23  4:09         ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-23  7:09           ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  5:37             ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-29  6:32               ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  9:19           ` Dave Chinner
2023-11-23  7:02         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-22 20:25     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-20 19:05 ` [RFC 3/3] ext2: Enable large folio support Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-11-20 20:00   ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wmtzhku7.fsf@doe.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox