Re: [GIT PULL v5.1] libfuse: run fuse servers as a contained service

[Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com>]

Hi Darrick,

On 4/30/26 23:18, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
> 
> Please pull this branch with changes for libfuse.
> 
> As usual, I did a test-merge with the main upstream branch as of a few
> minutes ago, and didn't see any conflicts.  Please let me know if you
> encounter any problems.

pushed to my github branch. BSD build fails with

2026-04-30T21:25:16.3874802Z FAILED: [code=1] lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0 
2026-04-30T21:25:16.3906762Z cc  -o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0 lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/fuse.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/fuse_loop.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/fuse_loop_mt.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/fuse_lowlevel.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/fuse_opt.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/fuse_signals.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/buffer.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/cuse_lowlevel.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/helper.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/modules_subdir.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/mount_util.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/fuse_log.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/compat.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/util.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/mount_bsd.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/fuse_service_stub.c.o lib/libfuse3.so.3.19.0.p/modules_iconv.c.o -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -shared -fPIC -Wl,-soname,libfuse3.so.4 -Wl,--version-script,/home/runner/work/libfuse/libfuse/lib/fuse_versionscript -pthread -Wl,--start-group -ldl -lrt -Wl,--end-group
2026-04-30T21:25:16.3939590Z ld: error: version script assignment of 'FUSE_3.19' to symbol 'fuse_service_can_allow_other' failed: symbol not defined
2026-04-30T21:25:16.3951874Z cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
2026-04-30T21:25:16.4291582Z [44/82] cc -Itest/test_teardown_watchdog.p -Itest -I../test -Iinclude -I../include -Ilib -I../lib -I. -I.. -fdiagnostics-color=always -


checkpatch, CodeChecker-cppcheck, CodeChecker-gcc also all fail. This CodeQL
report is funny

> int mount_service_main(int argc, char *argv[])
> Warning
> Poorly documented large function
> Poorly documented function: fewer than 2% comments for a function of 113 lines.
> CodeQL



I think I'm going to merge my sync fuse init series tomorrow. Are you ok if 
skip posting another version of the series? Or do you prefer to review the
recent changes and last piece I'm going to do tomorrow?

Basically my goal is to rebase your series against it immediately and to
merge your series during the next few days.


Cheers,
Bernd