From: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Ubuntu Kernel Team <kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udevd / ext4 issue mounting 2.6.35-rc5
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:10:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimNFIc8Ygg4O2NPHCYHk1G3dLBhYA2N9JSeAbdt@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikY0eeq1Ufs-UOCiHYXu_314HUnw7ESK5ktocWV@mail.gmail.com>
On 22 July 2010 02:06, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Daniel J Blueman
> <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> On 21 July 2010 01:36, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have been reluctant to boot to 2.6.35-rc due to the large set of
>>> regression list and the amount of work I needed to actually get done
>>> on 2.6.35. Last I checked the regression list it was getting small so
>>> I gave it a spin today. No luck. I get some bootup error from udevd
>>> and ext2/ext3/ext4, something like this:
>>>
>>> EXT3-fs (sda1): error: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional
>>> features (240)
>>> EXT2-fs (sda1): error: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional
>>> features (240)
>>> EXT4-fs (sda1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>>
>> This succeeded.
>
> Heh, OK :)
>
>>> VFS: Mounted root (ext4 filesystem) readonly on device 8:1
>>> Freeing unused kernel memory: 708k freed
>>> Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 102040k
>>> Freeing unused kernel memory: 764k freed
>>> Freeing unused kernel memory: 1796k freed
>>> udevd: failed to create queue file: No such file or directory
>>> udevd: error creating queue file
>>
>> It looks like you need to enable:
>>
>> CONFIG_DEVTMPFS
>> CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT
>
> Thanks, it also turned out that when I upgraded from Ubuntu 9.10 to
> Ubuntu 10.04 it replaced my own /sbin/installkernel so this was likely
> another issue. My /sbin/installkernel changes allow for easy initramfs
> installation on Debian/Ubuntu but my patches have been ignored my the
> maintainer.
>
> --- installkernel-ubuntu-10.04 2010-07-21 18:03:34.607678010 -0700
> +++ installkernel 2010-01-29 13:17:10.000000000 -0800
> @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@
> # Create backups of older versions before installing
> updatever () {
> if [ -f "$dir/$1-$ver" ] ; then
> - mv "$dir/$1-$ver" "$dir/$1-$ver.old"
> + #mv "$dir/$1-$ver" "$dir/$1-$ver.old"
> + rm -f "$dir/$1-$ver" "$dir/$1-$ver.old"
> fi
>
> cat "$2" > "$dir/$1-$ver"
> @@ -75,5 +76,16 @@
> if [ -f "$config" ] ; then
> updatever config "$config"
> fi
> +
> +LSB_RED_ID=$(/usr/bin/lsb_release -i -s)
> +
> +case $LSB_RED_ID in
> +"Ubuntu")
> + update-initramfs -c -k $ver
> + update-grub
> + ;;
> +*)
> + ;;
> +esac
>
> exit 0
>
> But anyway I also now get another boot failure with:
>
> mount: mounting /dev on /root/dev failed: No such file or directory
> mount: mounting /sys on /root/sys failed: No such file or directory
Hmm...the scripts in the initrd are not doing what is expected -
perhaps if you didn't use:
linux$ fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version -luis1 --initrd kernel-image
...or if there are eg initrd script modifications on the filesystem
when it cooked the initd.
You could just try eg:
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-2.6.35-9-generic_2.6.35-9.14_amd64.deb
...although it will regenerate it's initrd, so may suffer the same fate.
> http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/images/2010/bleh-boot-2.6.35-rc5.jpg
>
> Luis
--
Daniel J Blueman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-21 0:36 udevd / ext4 issue mounting 2.6.35-rc5 Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-21 8:43 ` Daniel J Blueman
2010-07-22 1:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-22 9:10 ` Daniel J Blueman [this message]
2010-07-23 16:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-23 17:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-26 23:43 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-07-27 12:34 ` Stefan Bader
2010-07-27 16:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimNFIc8Ygg4O2NPHCYHk1G3dLBhYA2N9JSeAbdt@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel.blueman@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).