From: Maxim Patlasov <maxim.patlasov@gmail.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: ext4_free_blocks() fix
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:17:30 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinZ5Lw0R9Nf1Un_gEA8DZqo7y15TA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307700474-25743-1-git-send-email-maxim.patlasov@gmail.com>
I apologise for flooding, patch description in former email was for
slightly different kernel version. Correct description is below:
Existent implementation of ext4_free_blocks() always calls dquot_free_block
This looks quite sensible in the most cases: blocks to be freed are associated
with inode and were accounted in quota and i_blocks some time ago.
However, there is a case when blocks to free were not accounted by the time
calling ext4_free_blocks() yet:
1. delalloc is on, write_begin pre-allocated some space in quota
2. write-back happens, ext4 allocates some blocks in ext4_ext_map_blocks()
3. then ext4_ext_map_blocks() gets an error (e.g. ENOSPC) from
ext4_ext_insert_extent() and calls ext4_free_blocks().
In this scenario, ext4_free_blocks() calls dquot_free_block() who, in turn,
decrements i_blocks for blocks which were not accounted yet (due to delalloc)
After clean umount, e2fsck reports something like:
> Inode 21, i_blocks is 5080, should be 5128. Fix<y>?
because i_blocks was erroneously decremented as explained above.
The patch fixes the problem by passing EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_SKIP_QUPD flag to
ext4_free_blocks(). This flag forces ext4_free_blocks() to skip
dquot_free_block() call.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <maxim.patlasov@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Maxim Patlasov
<maxim.patlasov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Existent implementation of ext4_free_blocks() always calls vfs_dq_free_block
> This looks quite sensible in the most cases: blocks to be freed are associated
> with inode and were accounted in quota and i_blocks some time ago.
>
> However, there is a case when blocks to free were not accounted by the time
> calling ext4_free_blocks() yet:
>
> 1. delalloc is on, write_begin pre-allocated some space in quota
> 2. write-back happens, ext4 allocates some blocks in ext4_ext_get_blocks()
> 3. then ext4_ext_get_blocks() gets an error (e.g. ENOSPC) from
> ext4_ext_insert_extent() and calls ext4_free_blocks().
>
> In this scenario, ext4_free_blocks() calls vfs_dq_free_block() who, in turn,
> decrements i_blocks for blocks which were not accounted yet (due to delalloc)
> After clean umount, e2fsck reports something like:
>
>> Inode 21, i_blocks is 5080, should be 5128. Fix<y>?
> because i_blocks was erroneously decremented as explained above.
>
> The patch fixes the problem by passing EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_SKIP_QUPD flag to
> ext4_free_blocks(). This flag forces ext4_free_blocks() to skip
> vfs_dq_free_block() call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <maxim.patlasov@gmail.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-10 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-10 10:07 [PATCH] ext4: ext4_free_blocks() fix Maxim Patlasov
2011-06-10 10:17 ` Maxim Patlasov [this message]
2011-07-10 23:39 ` Ted Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTinZ5Lw0R9Nf1Un_gEA8DZqo7y15TA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=maxim.patlasov@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).