From: harshad shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
To: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: prevent used blocks from being allocated during fast commit replay
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:26:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD+ocbx2e06YoESJM7m5ra-6so0ijWsYyN1L1ZFTXqxedMMoNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106024518.8161-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:45 PM Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> during fast commit replay procedure, we clear inode blocks bitmap in
> ext4_ext_clear_bb(), this may cause ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() allocate
> blocks still in use.
>
> make ext4_fc_record_regions() also record physical disk regions used by
> inodes during replay procedure. Then ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() can
> excludes these blocks in use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 ++
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 4 ++++
> fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 82fa51d6f145..7b0686758691 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -2932,6 +2932,8 @@ bool ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block);
> void ext4_fc_replay_cleanup(struct super_block *sb);
> int ext4_fc_commit(journal_t *journal, tid_t commit_tid);
> int __init ext4_fc_init_dentry_cache(void);
> +int ext4_fc_record_regions(struct super_block *sb, int ino,
> + ext4_lblk_t lblk, ext4_fsblk_t pblk, int len, int replay);
>
> /* mballoc.c */
> extern const struct seq_operations ext4_mb_seq_groups_ops;
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index c3e76a5de661..9b6c76629c93 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -6096,11 +6096,15 @@ int ext4_ext_clear_bb(struct inode *inode)
>
> ext4_mb_mark_bb(inode->i_sb,
> path[j].p_block, 1, 0);
> + ext4_fc_record_regions(inode->i_sb, inode->i_ino,
> + 0, path[j].p_block, 1, 1);
> }
> ext4_ext_drop_refs(path);
> kfree(path);
> }
> ext4_mb_mark_bb(inode->i_sb, map.m_pblk, map.m_len, 0);
> + ext4_fc_record_regions(inode->i_sb, inode->i_ino,
> + map.m_lblk, map.m_pblk, map.m_len, 1);
> }
> cur = cur + map.m_len;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> index 23d13983a281..f0cd20f5fe5e 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> @@ -1567,13 +1567,15 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_create(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_fc_tl *tl,
> * Record physical disk regions which are in use as per fast commit area. Our
> * simple replay phase allocator excludes these regions from allocation.
> */
> -static int ext4_fc_record_regions(struct super_block *sb, int ino,
> - ext4_lblk_t lblk, ext4_fsblk_t pblk, int len)
> +int ext4_fc_record_regions(struct super_block *sb, int ino,
> + ext4_lblk_t lblk, ext4_fsblk_t pblk, int len, int replay)
Can you explain a bit why this replay parameter is needed here? This
function simply reallocs the regions array if it doesn't have enough
space. I am not sure why we need to change that behavior.
> {
> struct ext4_fc_replay_state *state;
> struct ext4_fc_alloc_region *region;
>
> state = &EXT4_SB(sb)->s_fc_replay_state;
> + if (replay && state->fc_regions_used != state->fc_regions_valid)
> + state->fc_regions_used = state->fc_regions_valid;
> if (state->fc_regions_used == state->fc_regions_size) {
> state->fc_regions_size +=
> EXT4_FC_REPLAY_REALLOC_INCREMENT;
> @@ -1591,6 +1593,9 @@ static int ext4_fc_record_regions(struct super_block *sb, int ino,
> region->pblk = pblk;
> region->len = len;
>
> + if (replay)
> + state->fc_regions_valid++;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1938,7 +1943,7 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_scan(journal_t *journal,
> ret = ext4_fc_record_regions(sb,
> le32_to_cpu(ext.fc_ino),
> le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ext4_ext_pblock(ex),
> - ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ex));
> + ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ex), 0);
> if (ret < 0)
> break;
> ret = JBD2_FC_REPLAY_CONTINUE;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-07 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-06 2:45 [PATCH 0/2] fix blocks allocate issue during fast commit replay Xin Yin
2022-01-06 2:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: prevent used blocks from being allocated " Xin Yin
2022-01-07 20:26 ` harshad shirwadkar [this message]
2022-01-08 2:09 ` [External] " Xin Yin
2022-01-08 6:05 ` harshad shirwadkar
2022-01-09 3:01 ` Xin Yin
2022-01-06 2:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: modify the logic of ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple Xin Yin
2022-01-07 20:30 ` harshad shirwadkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAD+ocbx2e06YoESJM7m5ra-6so0ijWsYyN1L1ZFTXqxedMMoNw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yinxin.x@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).