linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Dong <hao.bigrat@gmail.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] Add new extent structure in ext4
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:51:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFZ0FUXT-X146SEAHCcNh-bGARUTgLOSP1dCrqeOrT48REN+ow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi Ted, Andreas and the list,

After the bigalloc-feature is completed in ext4, we could have much more
big size of block-group (also bigger continuous space), but the extent
structure of files now limit the extent size below 128MB, which is not
optimal.

We could solve the problem by creating a new extent format to support
larger extent size, which looks like this:

struct ext4_extent2 {
	__le64	ee_block;	/* first logical block extent covers */
	__le64	ee_start;	        /* starting physical block */
	__le32	ee_len;		/* number of blocks covered by extent */
	__le32	ee_flags;	/* flags and future extension */
};

struct ext4_extent2_idx {
	__le64	ei_block;	        /* index covers logical blocks from 'block' */
	__le64	ei_leaf;	        /* pointer to the physical block of the next level */
	__le32	ei_flags;	        /* flags and future extension */
	__le32	ei_unused;	/* padding */
};

I think we could keep the structure of ext4_extent_header and add new
imcompat flag EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS2.

The new extent format could support 16TB continuous space and larger volumes.

What's your opinion?

-- 
--
Best Regard
Robin Dong

             reply	other threads:[~2012-01-23 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-23 12:51 Robin Dong [this message]
2012-01-23 18:59 ` [RFC] Add new extent structure in ext4 Ted Ts'o
2012-01-23 23:17   ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-24 13:34 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-24 17:32   ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-25 22:48 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-25 23:03   ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-27  0:19     ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-27 14:27       ` Tao Ma
2012-01-29 22:07         ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-30 22:50           ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-30 23:52             ` Ted Ts'o
2012-02-01  3:57             ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-30 20:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-01-30 22:52   ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFZ0FUXT-X146SEAHCcNh-bGARUTgLOSP1dCrqeOrT48REN+ow@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hao.bigrat@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).