From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@gmail.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] jbd2/journal_commit_transaction: relocate state lock to incorporate all users
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:45:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP=VYLroGDmJLPvb3RL+FRN_F+zMBOdMyY8GpnLt2vVYE+900Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130611021230.GA23966@thunk.org>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:32:00PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> The state lock is taken after we are doing an assert on the state
>> value, not before. It is also taken after the jbd_debug() call.
>> Noting that jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk()
>> calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like
>> the following (see lines marked with "*"):
>
> This is only a cosmetic fix, but instead of trying to fix it by moving
> a lock --- which would only fix this issue, but there are probably
> others cases where this might be an issue, I'd suggest fixing it with
> something like this:
>
> /* in fs/jbd2/journal.c */
> void __jbd2_debug(int level, const char *func, unsigned int line, const char *fmt, ...)
> {
> struct va_format vaf;
> va_list args;
>
> if (level < jbd2_journal_enable_debug)
> return;
> va_start(args, fmt);
> vaf.fmt = fmt;
> vaf.va = &args
> printk(KERN_DEBUG, "jbd2: (%s, %u): %pV\n", func, line, &vaf);
> va_end(args);
> }
>
> /* in jbd2.h */
>
> #define jbd_debug(n, fmt, a...) __jbd2_debug((n), __func__, __LINE__, (fmt), ##a)
>
> Could you give this approach a try?
Sure, I will do so tomorrow - but since it can't be reproduced
on-demand, all I'll be able to do is to watch for independent
calls with very close time stamps, and confirm they were not
interleaved.
What about the state assert being done outside of the state
lock? Should I keep that as a separate patch so that the
assert isn't checking what could possibly be a transient value?
Thanks,
Paul.
--
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-11 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-10 19:31 [RFC PATCH 0/4] ext4/jbd2: several possible mainline fixes Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-10 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] jbd2/journal_commit_transaction: relocate state lock to incorporate all users Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-11 2:12 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 2:45 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2013-06-11 2:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 17:38 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-11 17:53 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 18:48 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-11 21:54 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-10 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] jbd2/log_wait_for_space: drop checkpoint mutex when waiting Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-11 2:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 3:20 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-11 13:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 13:20 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-10 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] jbd2: fix duplicate debug label for phase 2 Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-10 19:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] jbd/jbd2: relocate bit_spinlock header to jbd_common Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-10 23:38 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] ext4/jbd2: several possible mainline fixes Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 3:09 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-11 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] misc jbd2 fixes and cleanups Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] jbd2/journal_commit_transaction: relocate assert after state lock Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-13 2:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] jbd2/log_wait_for_space: drop checkpoint mutex when waiting Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-13 2:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] jbd2: fix duplicate debug label for phase 2 Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-13 2:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] jbd/jbd2: relocate bit_spinlock header to jbd_common Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-13 3:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] jbd2: make jbd_debug that won't split printk statements Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] jbd2: remove debug dependency on debug_fs; update help text Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-13 3:08 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-13 13:51 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-13 14:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-13 14:47 ` Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP=VYLroGDmJLPvb3RL+FRN_F+zMBOdMyY8GpnLt2vVYE+900Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=paul.gortmaker@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).