linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>, Alex Tomas <bzzz@sun.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Questions about mballoc's stream allocation
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:07:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1MZPAn-0001Y0-TQ@closure.thunk.org> (raw)


I've got two questions about mballoc's stream allocation.

First of all, in ext4_mb_regular_allocator(), I'm 99% sure this is a
bug:

	/* if stream allocation is enabled, use global goal */
	size = ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical + ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len;
	isize = i_size_read(ac->ac_inode) >> bsbits;
	if (size < isize)
		size = isize;

	if (size < sbi->s_mb_stream_request &&
	    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
			(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA)) {
		/* TBD: may be hot point */
		spin_lock(&sbi->s_md_lock);
		ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group = sbi->s_mb_last_group;
		ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start = sbi->s_mb_last_start;
		spin_unlock(&sbi->s_md_lock);
	}

Shouldn't that be ">=", not "<".  We want to use the values saved in
sbi->s_mb_last_{group,start} only if we are doing a stream allocation,
which would be true only if the file is *larger* than
s_mb_stream_request, no?


The second question I have is with regards to ext4_mb_use_best_found(),
we set sbi->s_mb_last_{group,start} on any data allocation; shouldn't we
only be setting those values only if we were doing a stream allocation
in the first place?

Otherwise, any kind of allocation will end up moving the global goal
block for stream allocations; even if it is a small allocation in the
middle of some block group caused by the flag EXT4_MB_HINT_NO_PREALLOC
being set.

Am I missing anything?

     	   	      	       		     - Ted

             reply	other threads:[~2009-08-07 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-07 13:07 Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2009-08-08  7:51 ` Questions about mballoc's stream allocation Andreas Dilger
2009-08-08 22:52 ` [PATCH,RFC 1/2] ext4: Fix bugs in mballoc's stream allocation mode Theodore Ts'o
2009-08-08 22:52 ` [PATCH,RFC 2/2] ext4: Avoid group preallocation for closed files Theodore Ts'o
2009-08-11 15:39 ` Questions about mballoc's stream allocation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-08-11 17:37   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1MZPAn-0001Y0-TQ@closure.thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=bzzz@sun.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).