From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0732AC4167B for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 21:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231964AbiLPVCo (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:02:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47840 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229627AbiLPVCn (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:02:43 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D646B200; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:02:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C9E762224; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 21:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AED6BC433D2; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 21:02:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1671224562; bh=fN6m4VVYYGNJr/6EwOlSmEnRz+a52skh6EEXOuEbYAA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eVyOzd9RrBpCgJg75WD8MZcN/gi1IB8OPt6rX3Zzx/yYmmEZwjchzPb24tjMuIeni tlZOy5hepolDqmDwN6RI+l8mWiFqaPi+Y0qYbu3Q95I138XpgZS7NgV1Y734GmMRpJ 6AyhmJWUsG06S8e+wtyFB8A4Ijq5pNRljDUveS6IUa8zxWE5mPZGQZnj9Exg2cco8G 3hcmfwjE3i+1omxMkMOAIUvoht8D1qUIVtvyLeIJ0/EZMjwtfewRJm3XX9iD4e0Bfa 3PQ+ku7tCHI5lo+ymT7FpDUKq20Tuj/nz67h0MWrqm6YecfgC0y/of5Z25PWvm5f9i PZPdc7K0z+qmQ== Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:02:39 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Fan Wu Cc: Luca Boccassi , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Jes Sorensen , Victor Hsieh Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsverity: mark builtin signatures as deprecated Message-ID: References: <20221208033548.122704-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20221209221719.GA3055@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221209221719.GA3055@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 02:17:19PM -0800, Fan Wu wrote: > We have also noticed many use cases for the fs-verity build-in signatures. Proposals > exist to use them[1]. Package managers were updated to use them[2]. We are > successfully using them in production. Therefore we prefer to keep the existing > build-in signatures. > > [1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FsVerityRPM#Enable_fs-verity_in_RPM > [2]https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1121 Aren't those the same project? I already mentioned in the commit message that it was rejected from Fedora and seems to have been abandoned. So it seems to be something that didn't actually work out. Let me know if you know of anything to the contrary... - Eric