From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E97CC433E0 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1882087E for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726590AbhAUX1h (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:27:37 -0500 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:40583 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726576AbhAUX1a (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:27:30 -0500 Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 10LNQeve026042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:26:41 -0500 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 9463515C35F5; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:26:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:26:40 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mke2fs.8: Improve valid block size documentation Message-ID: References: <20201216102206.23127-1-jack@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201216102206.23127-1-jack@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:22:06AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Explain which valid block sizes mke2fs supports in more detail. > > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Applied, thanks! - Ted