From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AC3C433B4 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A8D61163 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231443AbhDBUDP (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 16:03:15 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:54369 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229647AbhDBUDL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 16:03:11 -0400 Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 132K36Ol028596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 16:03:06 -0400 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id DEFED15C3ACE; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 16:03:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 16:03:05 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Andreas Dilger Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2image: add OPTIONS section to man page Message-ID: References: <20210309083508.30900-1-adilger@dilger.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210309083508.30900-1-adilger@dilger.ca> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 01:35:08AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Reorganize the e2image.8 man page so that the command-line options > are listed in a dedicated OPTIONS section, rather than being > interspersed among the text in the DESCRIPTION section. Otherwise, > it is difficult to determine which options are available, and to > find where each option is described. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger Applied, thanks. - Ted