linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mke2fs: warn about missing y2038 support when formatting fresh ext4 fs
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:25:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRR4fmg2eQMWf2iO@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210811233253.GC3601392@magnolia>

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 04:32:53PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> +/*
> + * Returns true if the user is forcing an old format (e.g. ext2, ext3).
> + *
> + * If there is no fs_types list, the user invoked us with no explicit type and
> + * gets the default (ext4) format.  If we find the latest format (ext4) in the
> + * type list, some combination of program name and -T argument put us in ext4
> + * mode.  Anything else (ext2, ext3, hurd) and we return false.
> + */

So that's not actually quite right.  Even if the user has no explicit
type, mke2fs will assign a default type --- and it's not necessarily
ext4.  You can see what the contents of the fs_types list using the -v
option:

% /bin/rm /tmp/foo.img ; mke2fs -vq /tmp/foo.img 8m
fs_types for mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext2', 'small'
% /bin/rm /tmp/foo.img ; mke2fs -vq -T news /tmp/foo.img 8m
fs_types for mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext2', 'news'
% /bin/rm /tmp/foo.img ; mkfs.ext4 -vq /tmp/foo.img 8m
fs_types for mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext4', 'small'
% /bin/rm /tmp/foo.img ; mkfs.ext4 -T huge -vq /tmp/foo.img 8m
fs_types for mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext4', 'huge'
% /bin/rm /tmp/foo.img ; mkfs.ext4 -o hurd -vq /tmp/foo.img 8m
fs_types for mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext2', 'small', 'hurd'

Also note that the ext2/ext3/ext4 fs_type will always be in
fs_types[0], so it's not necessary to search the entire list, as the
patch is currently doing:

> +	for (i = 0; fs_types[i]; i++)
> +		if (!strcmp(fs_types[i], "ext4"))
> +			found_ext4 = 1;


Cheers,

						- Ted

P.S.  Although I'm not aware of anyone actually doing this, if there
mke2fs is installed as mke3fs or mke4fs, that's the equivalent of
mkfs.ext3 and mkfs.ext4.  (See the logic in the parse_fs_type
function.)  Although perhaps there is some obscure distro somewhere
out there that I don't know about....

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-12  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-11 23:32 [PATCH] mke2fs: warn about missing y2038 support when formatting fresh ext4 fs Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-12  0:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-08-12  1:25 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2021-08-12 15:05   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YRR4fmg2eQMWf2iO@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).