From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v7] ext4: Speedup orphan file handling
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:14:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSUo4TBKjcdX7N/q@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816093626.18767-1-jack@suse.cz>
I've been running some tests exercising the orphan_file code, and
there are a number of failures:
ext4/orphan_file: 512 tests, 3 failures, 25 skipped, 7325 seconds
Failures: ext4/044 generic/475 generic/643
ext4/orphan_file_1k: 524 tests, 6 failures, 37 skipped, 8361 seconds
Failures: ext4/033 ext4/044 ext4/045 generic/273 generic/476 generic/643
generic/643 is the iomap swap failure, and can be ignored.
generic/475 is a pre-existing test flake that involves simulated disk
failures, which we can also ignore in the context or orphan_file.
However, ext4/044 is one that looks... interesting:
root@kvm-xfstests:~# e2fsck -fn /dev/vdc
e2fsck 1.46.4-orphan-file (22-Aug-2021)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Orphan file (inode 12) block 0 is not clean.
Clear? no
Failed to initialize orphan file.
Recreate? no
This is highly reproducible, and involves using a file system config
that is probably a little unusual:
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index orphan_file filetype sparse_super large_file
(This was created using "mke2fs -t ext3 -O orphan_file".)
The orphan_file_1k failures seem to involve running out of space in
the orphan_file, and the fallback to using the old fashioned orphan
list seems to return ENOSPC? For example, from ext4/045:
+mkdir: No space left on device
+Failed to create directories - 19679
ext4/045 creates a lot of directories when calls mkdir (ext4/045 tests
creating more than 65000 subdirectories in a directory), and so this
seems to be triggering a failure?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-16 9:57 [PATCH 0/5 v7] ext4: Speedup orphan file handling Jan Kara
2021-08-16 9:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] ext4: Support for checksumming from journal triggers Jan Kara
2021-08-16 9:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] ext4: Move orphan inode handling into a separate file Jan Kara
2021-08-16 9:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] ext4: Speedup ext4 orphan inode handling Jan Kara
2021-08-16 9:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: Orphan file documentation Jan Kara
2021-08-16 9:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: Improve scalability of ext4 orphan file handling Jan Kara
2021-08-24 17:14 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2021-08-25 11:30 ` [PATCH 0/5 v7] ext4: Speedup " Jan Kara
2021-08-25 16:13 ` Jan Kara
2021-08-25 17:48 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-08-25 22:13 ` Jan Kara
2021-08-25 22:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-08-26 14:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YSUo4TBKjcdX7N/q@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).