From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>,
Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:22:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfqTqAjEPalXzOK7@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxia2NNMPUCQzjo6Gsnz8xr_9YKTeTqzOu-hgdsjfHHx0w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Amir,
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:16 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > v5.16 released => patchset merged.
> > Thanks!
> Guys,
> Looks like we have a regression.
> With kernel v5.17-rc1, test fanotify22 blocks on the first test case,
> because the expected ECORRUPTED event on remount,abort is never received.
> The multiple error test cases also fail for the same reason.
> Gabriel,
> Are you aware of any ext4 change that could explain this regression?
> In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test
> instead of the default 5min.
> Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so...
We usually don't lower the default timeout, but here it's a good idea since here
it blocks. It's similar speed on my machine, but I'd be conservative and put
timeout 10 sec. Sending patch.
Kind regards,
Petr
> Thanks,
> Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 23:57 [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific mark types Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific events Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Introduce FAN_FS_ERROR test Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Validate the generic error info Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-19 5:38 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-19 19:29 ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-19 22:39 ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Support submission of debugfs commands Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Create a corrupted file Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Test file event with broken inode Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Test capture of multiple errors Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-19 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Amir Goldstein
2021-11-19 19:29 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-20 10:43 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-22 7:47 ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-22 17:35 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-22 21:09 ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-24 10:39 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-12-20 11:48 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-12-20 18:07 ` Petr Vorel
2022-01-10 15:16 ` Petr Vorel
2022-02-02 13:49 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-02-02 14:10 ` [LTP] " Jan Stancek
2022-02-02 16:45 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-02-02 14:22 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2022-02-02 16:13 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-02-02 16:57 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfqTqAjEPalXzOK7@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=repnop@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).