From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CF2C433EF for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344871AbiBBOWg (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:22:36 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:39042 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344872AbiBBOWf (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:22:35 -0500 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A680721128; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:22:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1643811754; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EFKOPJuk1IdAkljF/XJSg7G3dUqJ+jpAmQxaqluSBbU=; b=AHn7yIdqtPhrxDRq1quEFqpeyTe5jFmr+L60G7vrf005InBjW7ZIR5Cmoeb8sm+G8p+b3p 8rJvjhRjss2fujZyaY7nvdc6NsJdnI9SyuuA41jn/PEU+T8vo+mJ36KnwNmdeKQZPiE5bO +xhCfm3fFYkgtHfG6ZAXuXtEMnaQRms= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1643811754; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EFKOPJuk1IdAkljF/XJSg7G3dUqJ+jpAmQxaqluSBbU=; b=UUWSIi2XPje1hcJ2iZr0oQicYBTvjlf0eUnSx/n3fl9kPRuhEUUDeWiqk8ji01vqvA3NLX IxVwyP37RTlaWIBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D86E13BBC; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id RRI9FaqT+mHiaAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 14:22:34 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:22:32 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Amir Goldstein Cc: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , Jan Kara , Matthew Bobrowski , Ext4 , kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov , LTP List Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Message-ID: Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20211118235744.802584-1-krisman@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Hi Amir, > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:16 PM Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi all, > > v5.16 released => patchset merged. > > Thanks! > Guys, > Looks like we have a regression. > With kernel v5.17-rc1, test fanotify22 blocks on the first test case, > because the expected ECORRUPTED event on remount,abort is never received. > The multiple error test cases also fail for the same reason. > Gabriel, > Are you aware of any ext4 change that could explain this regression? > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test > instead of the default 5min. > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so... We usually don't lower the default timeout, but here it's a good idea since here it blocks. It's similar speed on my machine, but I'd be conservative and put timeout 10 sec. Sending patch. Kind regards, Petr > Thanks, > Amir.